Family law case - dispute over child living arrangements, in and out of court over years.
Ex currently paying for solicitor, I'm self-repp'ing. 4-day fact-finding hearing scheduled for early next year. As exH had representation, the court order says his solicitor will do the bundle. He agreed to this. Now he reckons he can't afford it (I actually have some sympathy for him on this, as I don't think he realised what he was agreeing to).
ExH has now told me that his solicitor wrote to the judge last week saying he wouldn't be doing the bundle, and couldn't the judge just make a decision based on his previous representations? This sounds very odd to me, and I don't think exH has got it right. I've asked for a copy of the letter, so won't prejudge the contents till I've seen them. But the question is this - should his solicitor be communicating to the judge without even letting me know?
I'm prepared to do the bundle myself if need be, so that's not the issue. It's more about feeling on the back-foot that any discussions about court might be had without my knowledge or input.