I have 3 children who live with me and stay with my ex alternate weekends. My ex pays no maintenance and doesn't contribute financially in any way towards any of the children.
My ex is "self employed" with their own small business, this is no secret as there's a business website, social media adverts all with ex's name and contact details on. Nothing is registered though so no tax paid, HMRC hold no records and all is cash in hand. Ex doesn't claim any state benefits.
Child Maintenance Service state they cannot help, just to report tax evasion to HMRC- which has been done but until business is registered with HMRC they won't chase for Maintenance, this business will never be registered with HMRC. So, ex has been given a zero liability and stated to CSA they are not working but living off of savings and being supported by family members hence no claim for benefits.
The property we still jointly own is now being sold, and an offer has been accepted. The Court Order for division of equity from the sale was made over a year ago when my ex and I had roughly equal Shared Residency and used to share all costs for the children equally so we agreed 50/50 on the equity for this reason.
Is there anyway I can now get a greater share of the equity? Most of mine will go immediately on various debts and legal fees plus a car for the children as it's difficult to get them to school where we live.
I'm thinking the the original Order for sale stating we've agreed 50/50 on the equity cannot be changed but can I made a Schedule 1 application for a lump sum payment from my ex's share? My reason being that my ex has not paid any maintenance for the last 6 months and given the children live with me and I pay for everything and provide everything for them - he literally doesn't contribute a penny and even demands I send them to his with bags of clothes and items for the weekend.
Can Schedule 1 be used this way or is it only possible if the other party is very wealthy/a high earner as on paper my ex is unemployed and with no income. It just seems so wrong that my ex will be receiving the same amount from the sale of the property as me from the sale and not a penny will go on the 3 children or be used for assessing maintenance liability.
Any advice gratefully received.