Hello. I’m hoping that someone with knowledge of the legalities around the small claims process might be able to give me some advice.
In as much of a nutshell as I can manage, DH and I appointed a builder to do a garage conversion for us – he started in April this year, but since about June the appearance of his men has been patchy at best and we’ve had numerous “discussions” with him which have always resulted in him apologising, assuring us of his best intentions but essentially doing nothing apart from sending someone on the odd day to do a bit of work then disappear again. Eventually, we lost patience when we discovered he had lied to us and last week wrote to him saying that we would be pursuing a claim against him in the small claims court. His payment terms were such that we’ve already paid him the majority of money for the job (I know, I know, but it seemed like a good arrangement at the time).
He clearly doesn’t want to go to court and has suggested that we try to settle ourselves. This would probably suit us as long as we get a reasonable amount of money back. We’ve had quotes for completing the job and for putting right the elements which are wrong (the roof, for instance, will not be signed off by Building Control, so needs to be taken off and redone) and I emailed him this weekend to say that we were looking for just over £8000 back from him. He is now saying that he will appoint an independent builder to quote – which, frankly, we won’t allow. If we need to get second quotes we will decide who to get them from, not let him ask some mate to quote low but that’s almost by the by.
Where we are now is that it’s looking very possible that we will go to the Small Claims Court but this could take time and we are heading into the winter months with an unfinished conversion which is open to the elements at the back. My big fear is that he will pay us something, but not the whole cost or, in the worst case, that he will declare himself bankrupt and not pay us anything. Both these scenarios mean that the longer we delay with completing the conversion, the more costs we are liable to open ourselves to. Already his roof has leaked – if it does so again and affects the interior, we could end up paying a lot more than £8K to put it right.
So my question is: is there any reason why we shouldn’t get two quotes (for the court) but go ahead and complete the work as soon as possible, claiming money back from him at the same time or retrospectively? Would the court think this was reasonable or would it be frowned on?
I apologise for the length of this but this situation has been dragging on for so long and has been so stressful for us that we just want to get it sorted in the quickest way that doesn’t leave us hugely out of pocket. Any advice would be massively appreciated.