Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) - Help/Advice needed.

11 replies

slumberjac · 24/06/2013 22:01

Hello

My ex and I (unmarried) have been referred to a FDR.

I am a litigant in person and need to know how the questionnaire should be set out. Can I ask for documents on it? (ie. self assessed tax returns, mortgage applications etc) Should I literally pull his form E apart with a list of questions as it is like reading a fairy tale?!! I believe I also have to list a chronology of the events leading up to the FDR? I haven't been able to locate an example of one on the internet to go by.

Any advice would be most welcome.

OP posts:
Collaborate · 24/06/2013 23:41

What kind of proceedings are they if you are unmarried?

slumberjac · 25/06/2013 06:28

tolata and schedule 1

OP posts:
Collaborate · 25/06/2013 07:41

You need to ask the questions as you say in your first post. Keep them relevant to the issues, and proportionate.
The chronology should be on 1 side of A4 and start with your dates of birth, then significant milestones thereafter.

slumberjac · 25/06/2013 09:25

So there's not a form that should be used?

Many thanks for your replies.

OP posts:
Collaborate · 25/06/2013 12:59

There's no prescribed form.

slumberjac · 25/06/2013 13:41

Sorry...more questions! You say the chronology should be on 1 side of an A4 sheet....mine will probably fill a book! How deep shall i go?!!!
Our Tolata and Schedule 1 apps have been replaced with the FDR but there's obviously a lot of history as to how we got here... I'm worried about missing something off that's relevant - I'm assuming the judge will just look at the questionnaire & the chronology (and not the defence/skeleton arguments) so shouldn't it be done in detail?

Thanks again!

OP posts:
slumberjac · 26/06/2013 07:09

Bump

OP posts:
slumberjac · 26/06/2013 07:10

Bump

OP posts:
slumberjac · 26/06/2013 07:11

Oops.... didn't mean to bump twice!

OP posts:
iheartdusty · 26/06/2013 22:14

The chronology is just for the main events, to put the case into a context. It is not the place to put your detailed narrative of what happened between you.

it might include, for example; your respective dates of birth; when you met; when you started to cohabit; when your DC were born; when you purchased properties (before or after you met).; when one of you left the main home (if that happened); when the applications to court were made.

there is absolutely no need whatsoever to include each twist and turn of your lives, particularly not in the chronology.

iheartdusty · 26/06/2013 22:16

the judge will look at the skeleton arguments, the application and the defence before the FDR.
s/e probably won't look at any of the documents in support such as the bank statements etc.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page