Friend got run into by another car, witnessed by a passing police car who said it was all the other car's fault.
When she contacted her insurance they told her that the police are not allowed to be witnesses for an accident, so if the other car refuses to admit liability they can't prove it. Hence she will lose no claims and have to pay excess.
Is this right? It sounds completely off the wall to me. Surely the police witnessing should be one of the best judges for an accident and whose fault it is? Certainly better than "my best friend saw it" which apparently is good enough.