I have residency exh has contact (he never signed the statement of Arrangements but court was satisfied with what was put forward)
Contact has been inconsistent and sporadic although he is great with them when he does see them.
He does not contribute any child support.
So I think he confuses responsibilities, duties and rights.
He keeps quoting CA 1989 at me.
This is what I know of CA '89 (sorry for long quote):
"Parental Responsibility is defined by the Children Act 1989 as being all the rights, duties, powers and responsibility which a parent of a child has in relation to the child and his or her property. It includes rights and duties with regard to education, choice of religion, administration of a child?s property and choice of residence. It is important to note that all the provisions of the Children Act 1989 are subject to the guiding principle of the child?s best interests and consequently the exercise of parental responsibility to limitations where disputes arise either between holders of parental responsibility or between parents and children.
Parental responsibility lasts until the child is 18, although at that upper end of childhood it should only be exercised in a way, which is consistent with the child?s evolving capacity and maturity. Having parental responsibility is legally distinct from being recognised as a child?s mother or father."
It says somewhere that parental responsibility can be exercised independently but obviously in best interests of the children.
My question is:
Do I or do I not have to seek written permission from exh for dcs activities (as he insists I do) e.g Some I do ask his permission (trips away without me) some I don't (if it is a spot decision obviously)?
Sorry if long and a bit confused.
Hope someone in the know can put me straight.