Thanks Collaborate. Ex-h works in the City and the greater part of his compensation does come from bonus, most of which is, in turn, paid in shares. As I understand your post, if he gets a £200,000 bonus, £150,000 of which is paid in shares which he cannot sell for 3 years (but does sell them as soon as he is able, for £150,000) then the CSA only MAY consider the £200,000 bonus and if it does, it will actually only take the £50,000 cash element into account? And won't take the £150k gain 3 years later into account at all?
Let's use a hypothetical situation:
NRP's salary is £150,000 so net weekly income is £1750.
The 2 children live with the PWC.
Maintenance is agreed during ancillary relief proceedings by reference to the CSA calculator at £1,300 pcm.
NRP is given a £200,000 bonus as above,£150,000 of which is in shares he can't sell immediately. He sells them in a later year, realising a £150,000 gain.
PWC never has any way of knowing what the actual bonus details are, nor what gains are made in any given year by selling bonus shares from previous years, but it is clear from the NRP's lifestyle that his lifestyle far outstrips his £150,000 "income". E.g. His monthly net salary is £7,500. He rents a house for £4,000 a month, so rent plus CM alone comes to £5,300. He has several holidays a year (without the DCs), staying at top-notch five star resorts, travelling business class; eats out several times a week; and spends tens of thousands of pounds pursuing an expensive hobby.
The PWC has a "normal" job, a normal little terraced home, and after childcare and mortgage each month, struggles to make ends meet. Certainly no holidays for the DCs.
So in this situation, is it not possible to receive a greater proportion of the actual overall earnings from employment of the NRP as CM? It seems completely ridiculous that someone could earn £350k in a year but only pay CM by reference to £150k!