resolution you said in repsonse to other poster "You are justified in suspending contact, but you must apply back to court as soon as possible to vary the order. You will thereby be seeking the court's approval, which is better for you than him applying to enforce the order."
so...i have suspended contact on matter reported to police. police/social services now come back to say they taking no action as i am protecting the DC having suspended contact. so they confirming i doing right thing. DC dont want to see exP.
so do i have to spend time/money varying order - or can i wait for exP to apply?
i know pre empting would be good but it will just cost more money and time (and all that is taken up with financial hearings at the moment see my other postings!) .
order is for supervised contact with adult agreed by both parties except otherwise agreed - i agreed otherwise ie allowed for unsupervised and it went horribly wrong (in part because i didnt pick up on his MH issues getting out of hand earlier - but as try to do quick handovers i had to rely on info from DC...) .
in principle - i could just apply supervised with adult we both agree to - and as there is no adult i can agree to it's not happening - but the reasons go beyond that really. unfortunately police didnt interview exP as they consider i am protecting them. also, DDS explicit in saying they want zero contact.
also, exP says he is going to get evidence from his MH team/GP this week to give me - (to say he is fine and well?) so i really want to wait to see what that says anyway...
not sure of benefit in spending time/money applying to court to vary the order when everything is in flux?
can i jsut sit and wait for him to apply?
(which he might not as is LIP with no money...original application came from ME as i applied for residence to regularise contact back in 2008)