surreyallerymum, I empathise. DS1 has an egg allergy and at his nursery, his keyworker allowed him to make cakes with eggs. (She didn't realise that am allergy meant no contact, not just no ingestion, though she excluded another allergic child from the same activity
). The nursery were useless. Ofsed were useless, the local authority were useless.
All the nursery were bothered about was how "upset" the nursery worker was (never mind how upset I was that they put my child into danger!). I emailed the local authority and they called me back, but my mobile was switched off at the time as I was teaching (university lecturer) - I couldn't get in touch with them again later, despite numerous attempts. Ofsted had to be informed by the nursery (legal requirement), but all they said was that the nursery had revised their allergy policy and would keep their registration.
When we were looking for a nursery for ds2 (dairy allergic), they waited 2 days before he was due to start and said they didn't have the procedures in place to ensure a safe environment for him (and then denied they were excluding him on the basis of allergy
.
The problem seems to be that allergies are not something Ofsted concern themselves with, but it falls between the cracks disability-wise too.
Also, parents of non-allergic children tend to think it is all fuss about nothing/hyper-protective parents or some such. So, when I told other parents I knew, only those with other allergic children were in the least bit concerned. Even they were of the opinion "oh that's worrying, my dc has also been given more piriton in the last couple of months", but tbh the convenience of on-site nursery in my case seemed to outweigh any concerns from parents.
The fact that they were a big chain meant they could bluff their way through the Ofsted stuff.
I don't have any answers, but it sucks.
My dp had to give up his (good) job to stay home and look after ds2 because we didn't have alternative childcare arrangements in place
.