Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Investments

Discuss investments with other users on our Investment forum. For more advice read our tips for saving for your child's future.

Pensions and the budget

64 replies

BasketOfBubbles · 27/08/2024 19:22

I am due to retire on 1st November ie a couple of days after the Budget. I have put-in for a 25% lump sum. The paperwork is going through.

I'm now panicking that the tax rules might be changed with immediate effect on October Budget day and I'll be screwed.

That couldn't happen could it? We'd need a bit of notice??

OP posts:
AuntieJoyce · 31/10/2024 13:38

All sorts of reasons @Floofydawg . Pensions are taxable income vs drawing on other assets. Unknown future investment returns mean most people draw down less than they need to. People don’t know when they will die. If your assets will be over £500k when you die it made sense to have the excess IHT free….

Flandango · 31/10/2024 13:43

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 13:10

It‘s not just income tax. Now it will be 40% inheritance tax with income tax on the 60%. That is double taxation.

That is exactly the same as any other inheritance outside of a pension. The money will be taxed as income on the way in, then taxed as inheritance. It is no more double taxation than regular IHT

Floofydawg · 31/10/2024 14:34

Putting · 30/10/2024 21:32

I think this is a sensible change. Pensions are meant to be something that provides income in retirement, not a way of creating an inheritance.

100% agree

HelloMyNameIsElderSmurf · 31/10/2024 17:28

Floofydawg · 31/10/2024 13:24

Sorry but unless you're mega rich who actually leaves their pensions to their kids? I intend to spend all of mine, that's why I've spent my entire working life saving for my retirement. Not so that I can leave retirement savings to my kids.

Pension underspend is actually an issue: people either hold on to their pots and don't spend enough on themselves because they don't want to run down the capital, or people of course die in early retirement.

The first case is quite difficult to manage because you don't want a 'wahey, take out your pot and spend it all on a cruise in your first month of retirement' message or attitude to get out there.

Putting · 31/10/2024 19:21

The first case is quite difficult to manage because you don't want a 'wahey, take out your pot and spend it all on a cruise in your first month of retirement' message or attitude to get out there.

Otherwise known as the Steve Webb Lamborghini messagjng

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 20:05

Flandango · 31/10/2024 13:43

That is exactly the same as any other inheritance outside of a pension. The money will be taxed as income on the way in, then taxed as inheritance. It is no more double taxation than regular IHT

So what is the benefit to locking your money away for decades, especially for a basic rate taxpayer?

With thresholds frozen for years we will all eventually be higher rate tax payers.

WhistPie · 31/10/2024 20:17

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 20:05

So what is the benefit to locking your money away for decades, especially for a basic rate taxpayer?

With thresholds frozen for years we will all eventually be higher rate tax payers.

Do you understand what a pension is for?

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 23:19

WhistPie · 31/10/2024 20:17

Do you understand what a pension is for?

You are asking the wrong question.

It should be: What is the best way to provide me with an income when I stop working and has the flexibility to take changing circumstances over a long period into account?

I am afraid that the answer is no longer pensions, at least not exclusively.

dierama · 01/11/2024 09:14

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 23:19

You are asking the wrong question.

It should be: What is the best way to provide me with an income when I stop working and has the flexibility to take changing circumstances over a long period into account?

I am afraid that the answer is no longer pensions, at least not exclusively.

Agreed. And the reality is that it will be rare for a person to have timed their pension to such perfection that it runs out exactly when they die. It is very common for people to die unexpectedly leaving their pension unused.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 09:28

messybutfun · 31/10/2024 23:19

You are asking the wrong question.

It should be: What is the best way to provide me with an income when I stop working and has the flexibility to take changing circumstances over a long period into account?

I am afraid that the answer is no longer pensions, at least not exclusively.

I'm sure you're right, I have not doubt tax advisers are providing adjusted advice on what to do now for those who did use the pension as a way to pass it down

WhistPie · 01/11/2024 09:59

A pension is for you to live on whilst not able to work, generally due to age or ill health. It's not a savings scheme for your descendents.

Gingerbee · 01/11/2024 10:28

I said to my Ds , looks like you won't get as much when we die.
His comment was " That's not a problem. I didn't earn the money or your pension pot.
It is there for you to enjoy life after years or hard work".
Got to admit that made me feel proud.

taxguru · 01/11/2024 10:41

WhistPie · 01/11/2024 09:59

A pension is for you to live on whilst not able to work, generally due to age or ill health. It's not a savings scheme for your descendents.

Trouble is that successive governments (of BOTH colours) made pensions into that by forever changing the rules and actively bringing in changes/exemptions that made pensions into a "savings scheme" as an option for IHT planning.

It's not the people using it as such who are the problem, it's the incompetent/incoherent politicians who've embraced "tax planning" into legislation for a few decades.

Look at Brown - he changed the pension rules, he brought in tax-free ISA, he reduced basic rate income tax, etc etc. He, too, was a tax saving Chancellor.

Both colours of politician have brought in all kinds of tax incentives such as venture capital trusts, enterprise investment schemes, bonded warehouses, enterprise parks, Freeports, film partnership tax relief, etc. They've actively brought in new IHT and CGT exemptions and reliefs. All of these "drive" behaviour.

So you really can't blame people for using pensions as a IHT planning tool, as the politicians have expressly brought in exemptions and reliefs for them to do just that!

Most tax planning isn't using "loopholes", it's using schemes specifically brought in by politicians to encourage certain behaviours. Of course, those same politicians cry foul when these schemes are used in a way they didn't expect, but they've only themselves to blame for that!!

messybutfun · 01/11/2024 15:47

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 09:28

I'm sure you're right, I have not doubt tax advisers are providing adjusted advice on what to do now for those who did use the pension as a way to pass it down

The thing with pensions is, once you‘ve put your money in, that’s it until you reach the minimum age.

As advisers we are looking for the best solution to a problem. When a pension is no longer the best solution to our clients‘ problems, we will of course recommend something else. With pensions we can‘t unwind what we have done already even when the goal posts get moved. Again and again.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page