Hi 👋 I was hoping for some advice. I am about to recommence IVF soon after a failed high stimulation short protocol.
My circumstances are:
- Age 37 (38 not too far off....)
- AMH 6
- AFC 4-6
- 1 x failed high stimulation IVF cycle (which led to 4 eggs, only 2 were mature, 1 failed to fertilise at all and the other abnormally fertilised with 3PN due to 2 sperm entering, so ICSI advised for next time)
- OH has lower morphology (but not worryingly low. Hence, IVF and no ICSI suggested the first time around), otherwise, all other parameters are good
Question is what have people's experiences been with natural modified and/or mild IVF?
I am reading a lot about natural modified being better for those with low AMH, if I only got 2 mature eggs in a high stimulation cycle, is it better to just go with natural modified? Would mild be that much different from the high stimulation cycle?
I am gauging with IVF consultants each have their own approach/ideas, so I would like to go into my next consultation with questions and to ensure we ourself make the best decision for us following the advice given.
Be good to hear different experiences. Natural modified is also a more cost-effective option, I am trying to gauge whether mild IVF would even be worth the extra cost in my circumstances. That cost difference could perhaps be used for more natural modified cycles and focus on quality with lower numbers (I would never get double digit eggs anyway)?
Shared experiences would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance! 🙂