Hi,
I posted under a similar username about our failed IVF cycle where we had a vy low fertilisation rate and no blastocysts. Based on the experiences of some other posters here, I was expecting the clinic to suggest things that we could do differently to try and make the cycle more successful if we go for round two.
Maybe I was expecting too much, but we had a cycle review meeting a few days ago and I honestly wasn't that impressed with the quality of the feedback. We know that there was a pretty severe morphology issue with my DP which impacted the cycle but the doctor didn't have the lab/embryology report in front of him to talk about how bad his sample was, whether it had deteriorated since his last semen sample was taken etc. The NHS consultant didn't seem that concerned around DP's sperm when she reviewed his initial test, so we were really keen to understand this more. We had to suggest that maybe it would be a good idea to see a urologist before trying another cycle. They also now think egg quality might be an issue. We asked about anything the clinic could vary next time to try and increase success but the clinic seem to want to follow the exact same protocol.
I thought that it would be best to stay with the same clinic for round two but I'm not wholly convinced by a) the lack of interest in exploring DP's issues and b) continuing with the exact same approach as before. Could we do better elsewhere? Is it worth changing clinic for a second round?