I didn't say I agreed with it, I said it was interesting.
Is it such a leap to say 'well if they can't feel anything how can it be wrong?' for adults as well as the unborn. Do we place a lower value on children who have not had a chance of life yet than those at the end of their natural lives?
I had an amnio for DS. We took it knowing that if it was positive I would have to take that decision. I was lucky (as was he). I weep for those parents who have to go through this horrible experience - but I'm also reminded of the little boy down the road whose parents were told he would not live beyond day one.
Mothers in particular, are vilified whatever their choices and no more so than on the subject of abortion - it's always 'the woman's right to choose' and to be condemned for it. Mothers of disabled children face daily judging - I've even seen it on Mumsnet recently. It's ludicrous that as a support network for women we cannot have an intelligent debate about anything without people crying foul and it descending into namecalling (that was not directed at anyone btw)
It just makes me really angry, for the babies and for the women involved.
I don't, personally, believe that pregnancy is all that linear, that on the dot at six weeks the heart starts beating, I think it's probably more fluid than that. I think perhaps, some babies feel no pain at 23 weeks, and others do. Perhaps babies will severe problems develop less quickly so they are less likely to have any sensorial developments?
Anyway, please don't be offended by me, whatever anyone decides, is their decision (and that of their partner hopefully), I was just saying it was an interesting allegory.