tbh I have mixed views on this.
While obviously hastening the deaths of patients in your care without their consent is wrong, I'm not sure that it can be argued that it is wrong to feel that someone who is suffering unbearable pain/indignity should perhaps be relieved from that, if the outcome is that they are going to die iminently anyway.
There is imo a difference between helping someone to die who is terminally ill and going to die a long, drawn-out death, and killing someone because you think they would be better off dead, i.e. due to serious disability.
In the former people are not saying that the patient is better off dead, the reality is the patient is going to die, is it really better to make that patient go through all the pain they can go through than to help them die more peacefully? Is any family member really ready to watch their relative die? Some might be, but could a family member be objective about the amount of pain their relative was in at the time of death if they found out that death had happened hours before it would have happened naturally anyway?
I wouldn't want to die a drawnout death. And the statement that you wouldn't let a dog die like that does carry some truth imho.
I, like expat, think that there is a place in society for legalized and regulated euthanasia.
I think this dr was misguided yes, but that he did IMO have good intentions. These people were going to die. And they were going to die soon. You can't compare it with shipman who killed off people who weren't terminally ill and who possibly had years of life ahead of them.