The Sunday Times printed this at the weekend.
Please don't be fooled by the smokescreen that is Paisley...it's the implication of homosexuality equalling paedophilia that's the killer and that the Times allowed it to run.
Liam Clarke's argument is that as Paisley was made aware that someone was a homosexual he should then have personally investigated to see if he was also a paedophile.
As he didn't investigate and make the leap of discovery from homosexual to paedophile Clarke suggests he was in someway guilty of covering up child sexual abuse akin to that of Cardinal Brady.
Can't believe that we are allowed to publish something like this today..
Thoughts please