Story here.
In short, a woman complained that her wheel-chair-using DD couldn't take part in activities on a proposed school trip, so the school changed the venue to one which claims it "is designed especially for people of all abilities" and "is committed to Access for All and to programs and facilities which offer equal opportunities in an integrated setting...."
The woman rejected this option too, but said her DD had suggested instead "several viable alternative options such as a red-carpet film premiere, with pre-film makeovers and a post-film VIP marquee party. Everyone could have participated in and contributed to this."
She has now withdrawn her DD from school, presumably to HE.
Obviously I don't know all the ins and outs, but was there really nothing she could have done at the second outdoor centre? I'm sure I've seen film of wheelchair-users abseiling, and the place seems very aware. I'm just not comfortable that the "inclusive" option highlighted is a) indoors b) focussed on looks c)...er, what about the boys? Will they want a makeover?