Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Payout for Carmen Quiroga after children traumatised at detention centre

8 replies

DorotheaPlenticlew · 30/01/2010 14:05

here

I hadn't heard about this before today, has anyone else been following it?

I hate the thought of children inside those places, and am very pleased she has won a payout, although I doubt it really compensates for what she and her children endured.

I know this is prob a trivial thing to think, but it makes me hope someone points her towards MN in addition to whatever other support she has got in RL...

OP posts:
DorotheaPlenticlew · 30/01/2010 14:58

bumpin'

OP posts:
edam · 30/01/2010 15:30

I'm glad she's won compensation but horrified at what this family endured. Think it bears cutting and pasting for anyone who doesn't have time to read the link:

"Quiroga applied for asylum as soon as she arrived in Britain in 2002, but after her initial claim and appeal were refused, the latter without her knowledge, the family were forced from their beds on the morning of 21 October 2004 by police and security guards, given an hour to pack and then bundled in a police van and taken without explanation to Oakington, which at the time Quiroga thought was a prison.

"The family's solicitors, Bhatt Murphy, argued that they had suffered verbal abuse and threats from detention centre staff, were denied access to medicines and appropriate children's food and, during two unsuccessful attempts to deport them by plane, were threatened with violence.

"On one occasion Quiroga was struck by a contracted security guard when she failed to maintain eye contact, as the children looked on. They were freed on bail in December 2004, 28 days after a judicial review of the appeal decision had been launched, and awarded British nationality four years later.

"Quiroga sought psychiatric help after seeing her youngest daughter strip-searching and abusing her dolls, imitating the behaviour she witnessed at Oakington."

Good grief, and we call ourselves a civilised society?

Bet similar treatment is still being meted out today. The Borders Agency were remarkably unbothered when I, amongst other MNers, got my MP to take up the case of a very young baby denied formula milk for a whole weekend. Neither agency nor home office gave a toss - they actually argued this was fine ? and in fact their response to my MP contained several obvious lies. They only conceded that this might have been wrong when I pointed this out to my MP.

I suspect the Borders Agency goes for easy targets to bump their stats up. Not the murderers and other violent criminals who should be removed, but decent families.

jaquelinehyde · 30/01/2010 15:37

The borders agency are a disgrace, I have had more dealing with them than I would ever have wanted. I wouldn't wish involvement with them on anyone.

The prisons they place these families in are a disgrace to this country.

DorotheaPlenticlew · 30/01/2010 18:30

Thank you for adding to the thread.

I haven't any personal experience of any of this but hope as many people see it as possible.

OP posts:
Trickle · 30/01/2010 18:39

Strip searching the youngest daughter!!!!!!!

I'm just dumbfounded - why are we doing any of this, in terms of flight risk families with young children are so low risk it's just.... I despair.

Asylum seekers shouldn't just loose all their human rights, and arn't we signed up to the UN convention on the rights of the child. How can our govt get away with this stuff without being dragged to some sort of international court?

edam · 30/01/2010 19:09

God knows. Because once the family has been snatched, they are kept hidden away from the outside world and any scrutiny? Because any legal advice depends on legal aid who don't want to fund cases of that nature?

DorotheaPlenticlew · 30/01/2010 19:25

Trickle, not that it is much consolation but I think it may mean that the child witnessed strip searching rather than being subjected to it herself -- I'm not sure that would be legal (?) In any case, I don't think the article is clearly stating she was subjected to that herself.

Then again, denying a tiny baby milk doesn't strike me as likely to be legal either, but edam says that happened too, so I guess you just don't know

OP posts:
edam · 30/01/2010 20:27

It's truly shocking, Dorothea, they offered the mother rehydration salts instead.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page