in 1996 a (male) colleague was promoted because he had a wife and child to support, whereas i, a single female, could, apparently, 'manage to support myself'. this was explained to a (female) colleague by my manager. said colleague approached me and discussed making a formal complaint as she was so appalled. shortly after i did not extend the contract that was offered to me (with the suggestion that something else 'might' come up) as i knew that an organisation that condoned such logic was not likely to provide me with a contented future.
that said, when i joined the organisation in 1991, as a female i had to sign a form where i promised not to get married or have children, with the understanding that should i choose to do either of these things, my contract was likely to be terminated. so i guess i should have known what i was getting myself into. female employees had to leave formal work functions at a set time to allow the men to 'enjoy' themselves unfettered.
these days, thanks to the european court of human rights, women are not outwardly treated in this manner, and more women are stepping up to the plate and exposing these situations in a legal arena.
discussing gender in various lectures since, i am heartily sick of (generally younger) students dismissing the idea of gender inequality in the workplace existing any more recently than 1970.
recently i have been looking at employee's experiences concerning gender transition in the workplace. v interesting stuff, from both a more traditional 'gender roles' perspective (and expectations of such), as well as changes in status/ salary etc.
tis a funny old world we live in, but i'll be doing my level best to support tomorrow. better late than never, eh?