I read his article in The Guardian and agree with an awful lot of things he said.
I think that the balance has shifted too far in favour of individuals' rights, rather than their responsibilities.
Obviously there were significant issues in the past - Hogarth's depictions are accurate in that respect. However, there was a far greater overall respect for authority, there were firmly implemented class barriers, the role of the Church played a key role in controlling the masses and the concept of individualism was marginal.
Since the 1960s, in the West, there has been an erosion of unquestioning respect for authority figures. Whilst this may mean that abuse of one's position is less likely (if you're a policeman/teacher etc), it also means that the kind of obedience and rigid social hierarchy has broken down.
We're encouraged to enter into a dialogue with our children, explaining why we want them to do X, rather than telling them to do something and expecting obedience. There are both advantages and disadvantages to this approach. Similarly, with more parents working and children in daycare, the family unit as the core of our society is fragmenting.
Now, I'm a lone working parent. Furthermore, DD is not unquestioningly obedient, hence I could be accused of hypocrisy. But, I do feel that there needs to be some element of rolling back the effects of the past four or so decades....