link here
Can anyone tell me what the point in Bounty is?
Apart from the silly name-judgyness in this article, there are a few more worrying things.
Firstly, if a third of teachers think the brightest kids are the 'naughtiest' then surely this points to a problem with the way these kids are being taught - they're obviously not engaged with the lesson.
And 74 percent of teachers say naughty kids are 'good kids' really. So did the other 26 percent of teachers just write them off as intrinsically evil or something?
And no, my kids' names aren't on either list.