Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Bigger thighs have a lower risk of premature death and heart disease

43 replies

Bettymum · 04/09/2009 09:21

Apparently the optimum circumference for your thigh is 60cm. I've just tried to measure mine with a ruler, I think they're 38cm around. I have a greatly increased risk of premature death .

OP posts:
MerlinsBeard · 05/09/2009 15:57

Mine are 19cm at the top. BUT that's about 17cm of muscle and 2 cm of wibble

Ah well - you gotta die of something

bronze · 05/09/2009 16:02

19cm thighs? do you not snap?

if I measure the fattest part mine are exactly 60cms. I never thought I would say that smugly.

I've always had bigger thighs in proportion.

MerlinsBeard · 05/09/2009 16:03

OOPS!!! I meant inches!! What is that in cm??

bronze · 05/09/2009 16:04

about 49

bronze · 05/09/2009 16:04

having a tape measure in desk drawer is useful

MerlinsBeard · 05/09/2009 16:05

23 cm

at my widest point i am about 67 cm (26 IN)

TheCrackFox · 05/09/2009 16:10

I am 60cm exactly.

Where do I collect my prize?

SixtyFootDoll · 05/09/2009 16:14

58cms, best get some eclairs down me to live longer!!

sherazade · 06/09/2009 13:10

i just about make it to 36 cm.
am a goner then...

bibbitybobbityhat · 06/09/2009 13:24

60cm for me too. But I am at least 30lb overweight. How can that be right? If I lose weight I know I will lose some round my thighs (and boobs!) but not much round the lower tummy area. Confused now ...

bibbitybobbityhat · 06/09/2009 13:24

60cm for me too. But I am at least 30lb overweight. How can that be right? If I lose weight I know I will lose some round my thighs (and boobs!) but not much round the lower tummy area. Confused now ...

UnquietDad · 06/09/2009 13:25

The Daily Mash has the last word on this subject!

sherazade · 06/09/2009 15:01

hilarious

ib · 06/09/2009 15:05

I don't get it though. Surely your height has something to do with it? I'm 5'4 and my thighs would have to be enormous to get to that point (I don't see how I could get there just with muscle), whereas for someone who'se 6 ft they wouldn't be...[hmmm]

sherazade · 06/09/2009 15:42

i dont know, ib. i know lots of petite women with chunky thighs (they aren't fat, though) and lots of tall women with tootpick thighs like mine. mind you am only 5 feet tall.

brettgirl2 · 06/09/2009 18:04

I am 5'10" and just about (still have some baby weight) within normal. My 61 1/2 cm legs probably would look bigger on someone 5'4"

I suspect it's just a load of nonsense, like much of this 'research'.

amicissima · 06/09/2009 21:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

nickelbabe · 08/09/2009 11:00

mine are 56cm.
(i'm 5' 8")

IIRC, it should be approximately the same size as your head circumference.
so maybe they're also saying that the optimum head size is 60cm?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page