i suppose in the 3,000 veggies in the study therea are all sorts of types of veggies
as there are all sorts of meat eaters.
i would expect with such a large group they would balance out
the study sdeems to be just based on 2
questons-
doyou eat meat?
do you eat fish and no meat?
there are 3 groups-
those that eat meat (and presumably fisha nd veg)
those that eat fish (and presumabley veg)
and those that don't eat meat or fish.
That's it- no other questions such as how often do you eat meat, how often do you have 5 portions of fruit snad veg etc...
The sheer numebr of people responding it hink thak out akot of the waht ifs somehow.
And it showed that for "blood cancers" the veggie group had nearly half the rate as the meat gruop.
can't remember the other results, but overall the rate of cancer was lower for the veggie and fish only people than the meat people.
err, that's it.
Now we can all argue about whether or not rice is more toxic/les toxic to the enivroment than cows,
whether quorn is worse that chicken etc...
and these will prob be further studies.
But we don't actually have any sceintific results to show this- so the rest is speculation at this point.
the interviewer tried to lead the prof to say that the results of his study showed that people should not eat meat. he hesitated a bit, but said that the results show that we really need to look inot what is about a veggie diet/lifstyle that maybe can help protect against cnacer......