Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Should this policeman be allowed his police pension?

14 replies

Doonhamer · 17/06/2009 15:03

here and there's more
here about his legal aid
I knew this man, and trusted him as a policeman. I don't think he should be allowed his police pension, regardless of how long he was in the force, he betrayed the trust others had in him. I do know someone though who thinks he should be able to get it all.
I am genuienly interested to hear what others think

OP posts:
herbietea · 17/06/2009 15:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Doonhamer · 17/06/2009 15:15

It is quite shocking isn't it? he was in my house on more than one occasion! it's shocking to think what he could have done

OP posts:
GrandadOnagar · 17/06/2009 15:17

I understand the feeling, but you pay in for a pension don't you so I suppose that's got to be a seperate thing. If it was a reward for good service that would be different.

edam · 17/06/2009 15:18

He only served seven years for two rapes? Bloody hell. Should be grateful he's not in for 15, not bellyaching about his ruddy pension. (I note he's still receiving part of it anyway.)

Would be appropriate if one of his victims sued. Although I expect the last thing they would want is to have anything to do with this scum ever again.

edam · 17/06/2009 15:20

Onager, he is getting the part of the pension covered by his own contributions - just not the employer's contributions.

Doonhamer · 17/06/2009 15:21

They probably see him a lot, as he is back living in Dumfries and walks about as bold as brass!

OP posts:
PortAndLemon · 17/06/2009 15:22

No way should he get the employers' contribution bit. As I understand it that's very clear from his terms of employment.

I am tempted to suggest that he should get all his police pension, but that his victims should be awarded damages against him that will conveniently eat it all up when paid in installments. Probably tricky to manage, though.

littleducks · 17/06/2009 15:34

Morally he def shouldnt get it, but practically i suppose it depends on his terms of employment and contract, hopefully they were explicit and he will have no case

GrandadOnagar · 17/06/2009 15:35

Edam, maybe that is ok then. I suppose it depends on the contract.

And yeah I'd have no problem with the victims suing and leaving him penniless. I do think an officer who commits crimes has committed an extra one because of his position.

Doonhamer · 17/06/2009 15:40

D&G constabulary waited until he was charged and jailed before dismissing him

OP posts:
LeninGrad · 17/06/2009 15:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Doonhamer · 17/06/2009 16:04

I'm inclined to think that rape is more than gross misconduct, but I get your point.

OP posts:
LeninGrad · 17/06/2009 16:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeninGrad · 17/06/2009 16:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page