I didn't say it was right - in fact, I specifically said that I did not think it should be a crime and that I thought it was dreadful.
I also said that I didn't know the back story and was commenting on the story as presented - a woman committed adultery in a country where adultery is illegal and punishable by imprisonment.
Now, like I said, I don't agree that that should be the case, but my point was - that it is the case. It is illegal in Dubai to commit adultery. What I was saying is that if she had committed adultery in a country where (whether we think it is right or wrong) adultery is a crime, then she is punished because that is the law. Because her other choice was to not commit adultery (the 'crime'), wasn't it?
However, wannabe and others then put me right and gave me more information than was in the original link, and it seems there is doubt that she actually did break their law.
I'm not saying that the law is right, as it happens I think it is very wrong. I was saying that if you know a law exists, whether you agree with it or not, then you break it knowing the consequences of doing so.
Adultery is a choice you make, rape is not, and that is also a big difference.
And you haven't got my back up at all, btw. You make a very good point. You are taking a far broader view, whereas I was focusing entirely on committing adultery knowing you are doing it in a country where it is a crime.