Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Nigel Farage took £5m personally from a crypto billionaire. The policy change followed.

32 replies

UknownM · 15/05/2026 18:39

Did anyone else clock the Sky News reporting on the £5m personal gift to Farage?

Christopher Harborne, a Tether billionaire, gave Farage £5m personally in early 2024. Farage cash-bought a £1.4m house in May 2024 (location undisclosed, not in Clacton). Harborne has given Reform UK a further £12m on top, taking the total to about £17m. Reform UK then became the first UK party to accept crypto donations and launched a bill that would cut crypto capital gains tax from 24 per cent to a flat 10 per cent. Roughly a month after one of the £9m tranches, Farage went on LBC and defended Tether by name. The UK government has gone the other way and banned crypto political donations from March 2025.

The Clacton property Farage said he had bought turns out to be his partner's. Laure Ferrari paid £885k cash for it in November 2024 and won't say where the money came from beyond "a very large inheritance".

Standards Commissioner is investigating. Farage says the £5m was a "reward for campaigning for Brexit" and that Harborne wants nothing in return.

Full timeline with sources cited inline: trendingsheet.com/article/farage-5-million-tether-crypto-donor-christopher-harborne-uk

Is this a "donor wanted nothing in return" story or something else?

OP posts:
GasperyJacquesRoberts · 15/05/2026 19:47

This reply has been hidden

This reply has been hidden until the MNHQ team can have a look at it.

inkognitha · 15/05/2026 19:56

I wouldn’t rule it out, but it’s not going to make him less popular anyway.

prh47bridge · 16/05/2026 08:27

Regardless of whether the donor wanted anything in return, the problem for Farage is that he should have declared it in the register of interests. He did not do so. He claims that he was not required to declare it, but every reason he has given for the donation so far (initially that it was for his security, now that it was a reward for his campaigning on Brexit) makes it clear that it should have been declared.

I doubt this will make any difference to his popularity amongst his devoted fans. They will view this as a stitch up by the establishment and will, wrongly, believe that politicians from other parties would get away with similar behaviour. However, it may move some swing voters against him.

HelpMeGetThrough · 16/05/2026 09:30

So we have:

30p Lee and now….

500 Million p Farage

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:22

Indeed.

And when the government banned c-money political donations, Zia Yusuf described this as "choking off" Reform's funding...

That's quite an admission! I'm not sure Yusuf realises what he said there...

BeardySchnauzer · 16/05/2026 10:27

The house buying looks very much like second home stamp duty avoidance. I know a journalist did an investigation into his partners finance and found that sort of cash wasn’t really washing about in her family etc etc

the donations stink but sadly I think the farage fans don’t care because it’s not unexpected

also pretty sickening of ITV to have paid him so much for his stint on I’m a celeb

the man’s a grifter with no real interest in the UK or its people and hopefully his supporters will start to see that.

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:35

What's more, Reform admits thats Farage decided to stand as MP after receiving the £5 million.

Announced he was retiring from politics in 2021 and resigned as leader of Reform; got the dosh on 5 April 2024; announced he would stand for Parliament on 3 June 2024.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l26g01703o

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c809gkg7m00o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage

Nigel Farage sitting at a table being interviewed in the jungle

Nigel Farage paid for £1.4m house with I'm a Celebrity cash, says Reform

The Reform UK leader is being investigated by Parliament's standards watchdog over a £5m gift from a billionaire.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c809gkg7m00o

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:37

Deeeeeefinitely nothing to see here. Move along...

UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:04

inkognitha · 15/05/2026 19:56

I wouldn’t rule it out, but it’s not going to make him less popular anyway.

You are right that his core base will absorb it. The interesting question is whether swing voters from the 2024 general election move. Reform got about 4 million votes nationally on a thesis that the establishment parties were captured by donors and lobbyists. A £5 million personal gift from a Tether shareholder, while Farage was actively defending Tether on LBC, is a direct stress test for that specific thesis. We will find out in the 2026 quarterly polling once the story has had time to filter through to people who are not on Mumsnet at half-past ten on a Saturday.

OP posts:
UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:28

prh47bridge · 16/05/2026 08:27

Regardless of whether the donor wanted anything in return, the problem for Farage is that he should have declared it in the register of interests. He did not do so. He claims that he was not required to declare it, but every reason he has given for the donation so far (initially that it was for his security, now that it was a reward for his campaigning on Brexit) makes it clear that it should have been declared.

I doubt this will make any difference to his popularity amongst his devoted fans. They will view this as a stitch up by the establishment and will, wrongly, believe that politicians from other parties would get away with similar behaviour. However, it may move some swing voters against him.

Worth adding what the rule actually says. Under the MPs' Code of Conduct and the Guide to the Rules, a new Member must register relevant benefits received in the period leading up to their election. Farage was elected on 4 July 2024 and the gift was received on 5 April 2024 per BBC reporting, placing it inside the look-back window. The "no obligation" argument therefore turns on a contested reading of that look-back rule, not on the timing itself. On the evolving rationales, you have the key point. Each successive reason offered by him for a register-relevant benefit is itself further evidence the benefit fell within the meaning of the rules. The Standards Commissioner's inquiry is essentially asking whether his interpretation was reasonable.

OP posts:
UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:29

HelpMeGetThrough · 16/05/2026 09:30

So we have:

30p Lee and now….

500 Million p Farage

Quite a maths problem for anyone who buys the welfare-fraud framing. £5 million works out to roughly 17 million of those 30p meals.

OP posts:
UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:30

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:22

Indeed.

And when the government banned c-money political donations, Zia Yusuf described this as "choking off" Reform's funding...

That's quite an admission! I'm not sure Yusuf realises what he said there...

Yusuf's framing is its own evidence. Christopher Harborne has given Reform UK approximately £17 million across 2024 to early 2026, including a £9 million 2025 donation that Reform UK has publicly described as the largest single annual donation to a UK political party by a living person. If banning crypto donations specifically "chokes off" Reform's funding, that puts a fairly specific number on how much of the party machine is one donor.

OP posts:
UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:33

BeardySchnauzer · 16/05/2026 10:27

The house buying looks very much like second home stamp duty avoidance. I know a journalist did an investigation into his partners finance and found that sort of cash wasn’t really washing about in her family etc etc

the donations stink but sadly I think the farage fans don’t care because it’s not unexpected

also pretty sickening of ITV to have paid him so much for his stint on I’m a celeb

the man’s a grifter with no real interest in the UK or its people and hopefully his supporters will start to see that.

On the family-finance question, you are right. The reporting that has been published has not found a source of cash on Ferrari's side that would obviously explain an £885,000 cash purchase outright. Ferrari has only said "very large inheritance" and "I can't say how much my grandmother gave, that's my business." Reform UK has gone with "very wealthy French family." HM Land Registry records the purchase but does not record source of funds.
On the stamp duty point, the structure of two separate sole-owner purchases (Farage on a £1.4 million property elsewhere, Ferrari sole owner on the £885,000 Frinton-on-Sea property) does mean each is taxed as a first-home rather than additional-property purchase for the respective owner. Whether that is by design or by separate financial arrangement is not something I can tell from the published record.

OP posts:
UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:34

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:35

What's more, Reform admits thats Farage decided to stand as MP after receiving the £5 million.

Announced he was retiring from politics in 2021 and resigned as leader of Reform; got the dosh on 5 April 2024; announced he would stand for Parliament on 3 June 2024.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l26g01703o

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c809gkg7m00o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage

That timeline is the strongest part of the public record. Gift received 5 April 2024. £1.4 million property completed in May 2024. Announces standing for Parliament 3 June 2024. The gap between "private citizen who has retired from politics in 2021" and "standing as Reform UK candidate in Clacton" is about eight weeks, with a £5 million personal gift sitting in the middle.
Farage has framed that gift as "a reward for campaigning for Brexit." That framing is internally inconsistent with his own 2021 retirement-from-politics announcement. There is nothing in the published rationale that explains why a reward for past Brexit campaigning would arrive three years after the campaign ended, and weeks before a candidate announcement Farage had already publicly disclaimed any intention of making.
That is the question the Standards Commissioner is now examining

OP posts:
BeardySchnauzer · 16/05/2026 12:42

UknownM · 16/05/2026 12:33

On the family-finance question, you are right. The reporting that has been published has not found a source of cash on Ferrari's side that would obviously explain an £885,000 cash purchase outright. Ferrari has only said "very large inheritance" and "I can't say how much my grandmother gave, that's my business." Reform UK has gone with "very wealthy French family." HM Land Registry records the purchase but does not record source of funds.
On the stamp duty point, the structure of two separate sole-owner purchases (Farage on a £1.4 million property elsewhere, Ferrari sole owner on the £885,000 Frinton-on-Sea property) does mean each is taxed as a first-home rather than additional-property purchase for the respective owner. Whether that is by design or by separate financial arrangement is not something I can tell from the published record.

I believe the investigative journalist found no evidence of wealth in her family

if it was a gift for doing his job (self employed or not!) should he have paid income tax on it?

Summerhillsquare · 16/05/2026 13:26

PerkingFaintly · 16/05/2026 10:22

Indeed.

And when the government banned c-money political donations, Zia Yusuf described this as "choking off" Reform's funding...

That's quite an admission! I'm not sure Yusuf realises what he said there...

Admittedly he's not the sharpest, but basically he isn't accountable so doesn't care. We need to make these people accountable, which at least is starting to happen now.

Greenwitchart · 16/05/2026 13:31

The fact that Farage keeps changing his story is suspicious.

First his girlfriend was supposed to have bough the house but with no sign of where she would have got that money from. Then the 5 million was supposed to be for his security (although he was offered free security by the police already and spends next to zero time in Clacton anyway), then it was a ''gift'' for supporting Brexit, then it looks like some of that was used to buy that house.

Farage has got used to not facing proper scrutiny from the press but seems to crumble and not be able to explain himself as soon as his affairs are properly looked at...

TheWildZebra · 16/05/2026 13:39

Can’t believe this isn’t getting more traction in mainstream news - meanwhile Polanskis bloody houseboat tax news is everywhere 🙄🙄 dishonest but hardly comparable.

guardian have been publishing stuff around this for weeks - since before the local elections definitely but why wasn’t there more talk about this from the main parties?

also a reward for brexit? So we’re admitting payment for massive political decisions and lobbying?

reform the most non-credible party out there.

deeahgwitch · 16/05/2026 15:27

Why isn’t this getting wider coverage ?

TheWildZebra · 18/05/2026 15:39

deeahgwitch · 16/05/2026 15:27

Why isn’t this getting wider coverage ?

It’s finally headline on the FT today, along with the following detail summarised by a commenter:

  • first it was a strings-free gift of £5M, absolutely no expectations or conditions
  • Then it was a gift but to pay for his security (so payment paid for a particular purpose - so neither a gift nor strings-free)
  • Then it was a gift to recognise his Brexit political campaigning (so payment not a gift)
  • Then the £5M couldn't have been used to pay for his house, because that money came from being on TV
  • Except that TV money couldn't have been used......
nicepotoftea · 20/05/2026 09:51

TheWildZebra · 18/05/2026 15:39

It’s finally headline on the FT today, along with the following detail summarised by a commenter:

  • first it was a strings-free gift of £5M, absolutely no expectations or conditions
  • Then it was a gift but to pay for his security (so payment paid for a particular purpose - so neither a gift nor strings-free)
  • Then it was a gift to recognise his Brexit political campaigning (so payment not a gift)
  • Then the £5M couldn't have been used to pay for his house, because that money came from being on TV
  • Except that TV money couldn't have been used......

They seem to be arguing that it didn't need to be declared if it was a payment for personal security - I can't see anything in the rules that says that.

If anything, if Farage thinks the only thing protecting himself and his family is Harbourne's money, doesn't that imply that the influence is greater?

TemperanceWest · 20/05/2026 09:54

Farage seems to have gone into hiding...

lonelyplanetmum · 20/05/2026 10:15

I’ve listed some of Farage’s red flags before. However the facts don’t seem to make much difference with his fan base. It’s the same with Trump- a significant chunk of the electorate ( foolishly) feel he will help them, unfortunately the feelz overwrite the facts.

in addition to the current £5,000,000 to him and £12m to the party there are these past examples. It’s a pattern. Previous red flags include:

🚩£32,000- spent on one single trip flying to the USA. This was to try and fawn over Trump in July 2024 immediately after being elected as the MP for Clacton. He rushed to the States referring to Trump as his ‘ close personal friend’ except Trump refused to see him! Trump has refused to see him again recently too.

🚩Just under £500,000 personal support from Arron Banks in return for supporting Brexit including a chauffeur & a Land Rover Discovery (valued at £32,300) plus £20,000 for a driver. Plus the rent and bills for a £4.4 million, three-bedroom Chelsea house and garage, rented for an estimated £13,000 a month via Banks's firm, Rock Services, plus furnishings for the house.

🚩£2 million in EU salaries, allowances and expenses while simultaneously being anti-EU . He lost part of that MEP salary, following an official enquiry proving that funds for parliamentary staffing were entirely misspent.

🚩 £380,000 undeclared payments -recently apologized to Parliament for failing to declare this sum.

But facts and flags don’t matter, it fascinates me how the spin seems to work better now, despite the awareness of AI and the ease of fact checking on devices in our pockets.

nicepotoftea · 20/05/2026 10:16

I think he might get to the point where it will be in his interests to agree that the Harbourne money did pay for the house, because if the money didn't come from Harbourne or income already in the register of member's interests, where did it come from?

BeardySchnauzer · 20/05/2026 10:30

He’s really digging himself a hole

and on what planet does someone gift you £5m quid with no strings attached. He really takes people for idiots

Swipe left for the next trending thread