I've read the whole report and although I think it does show that Heather Mills McCartney was unable to produce a lot of documents, the Judge was surprisingly accommodating when it came to believing everything Paul McCartney said.
When my dad divorced my mum he deliberately underestimated his assets in an attempt to get my mum to sell the house and split the proceeds (He attempted to make it prohibitively expensive for her to buy him out) but it didn't work. It does seem like Paul McCartney has been given the benefit of teh doubt while Heather was not RE his wealth and his behaviour during the marriage.
Money aside I think it's really unfair that the Judge agreed their union only properly began when they got married.
I also think that the newspapers which have printed vile stuff about her in the last few days and the people who are so ready to believe them are very very wrong not to mention incredibly mean spirited.
These are the same people who are up in arms about recent stuff to do with the Mccanns.
Isn't it funny how some people take what the red-tops write as the truth when it suits them but then freak out when they say something about people they like?
I don't know if Heather Mills McCartney is a liar, a bitch or a gold-digger and I seriously have a hard time warming to anyone who can say they hate her just because of what they read in the papers.
It takes two to make a bad marriage and heaven forbid no one I know ever finds themselves in a situation where they are villified by people they don't even know because of their marriage.