Yes, I agree with MorningPaper too. This is what the Telegraph article was all about.
These websites (some of them are very specifically pro-suicide), are glamorizing the ending of life. Children who are vulnerable and unhappy are being dragged into a surreal chatroom world, where it becomes far easier to do what teenagers (lets face it) have been doing for years .. taking their own lives.
But there are alarming clusters (such as Bridgend, and the US can cite many, I believe), and they are generally in areas where depression is already quite rife. So the one feeds the other. Some of the kids truly believe that the only way they shall achieve fame, (something completely unimportant to my generation), is to do something that will immortalize you.
Unfortunately, however, these poor kids are immortalized for no more than five minutes, before the next kid comes along. Life is cheap at midnight, when your life is already shit, and people are cyber-whispering in your ear that there is an easy solution.
The article I read implied that suicide web-sites (or any site that glamorized it as a sub-text) would be closed down, in much the same way as the law currently applies to paedophile sites.
It won't stop them, but it will make it much harder for teenagers to access them, and the instigators can, at least, be prosecuted for incitement to commit suicide.