@xxcatcatcatxx
It's not a dumb question at all.
In essence, we will still be providing a skeleton service as a full walkout I believe is not allowed.
This goes way back to the dispute of 89/90 where 'ambulance drivers' then took to picket lines for many weeks, and the army were deployed as cover.
It was this strike action which drove the ambulance services as you see them now - highly skilled clinicians with a raft of acquired knowledge in pre hospital care.
It's kind of why ambulance staff hate the term 'driver' now.
Ive colleagues that were involved in that dispute, they fought hard to bring us in line with Fire and Police services, to receive funding to train staff to a high level.
And a PP is right, ambulance services are technically an 'essential service' rather than an emergency service.
Personally, I think a 19% pay rise is completely unattainable but, we do deserve more than what we were currently offered.
This is so much more than just about a pay rise.
Sorry, I derailed!
As I've said, there will still be ambulances to cover the most serious of calls.
Cat1 and some Cat2 calls which unfortunately are often over triaged....
Cat3 and Cat4 calls will have to wait longer unfortunately and this is the double edged sword.
An example of a Cat3 would be an elderly faller - the likelihood is that that kind of call could be a hip fracture, the prognosis for these patients is poor if they incur lengthy delays.
It's something we face daily already and it breaks me sometimes when we are en route to a faller, who has already had a long lie, to be cancelled for a Cat1 25 year old that 'can't breathe' - we rock up and said 25 yr old has a blocked nose (this has genuinely happened).
Sorry, again, that probably didn't answer your question.
As it stands at the moment, with current delays etc strike action won't have a huge impact, but we do have to make a stand.