Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Barry George wins his appeal

14 replies

NAB3littlemonkeys · 15/11/2007 11:10

He will now have a retrial.

OP posts:
AitchTwoOh · 15/11/2007 11:11

oh good, that's fair. but amazing, under the circumstances. poor man, if he's innocent...

southeastastra · 15/11/2007 11:12

good, never thought he was guilty

Piffle · 15/11/2007 11:13

twas teh sketchiest bit of evidence to get convicted on really.
When you consider some rape trials and the multitude of forensic eveidence yet the difficulty of conviction the mind boggles at how he got convicted

donnie · 15/11/2007 13:36

I have always though he is innocent of this crime.If he is - I hope he is released as soon as. Wonder when the re-trial will be.

In any case his life is ruined. Ditto that of Jill Dando's family.What a mess but thank God for the vigilance of his lawyers.

Quadrophenia · 15/11/2007 17:36

so pleased about this, he deserves a retrial, i thought alot of the 'evidence' presented in the documentary regarding this was very sketchy.

Blu · 18/11/2007 15:53

There was a documentary about his original trial the night before the appeal started.

It was scandalous, what happened.

All the witnesses gave different descriptions of the man thought to be the killer leaving the house - all sorts of different details (as is quite common in witness statements) - but the detail they all gave was that he had shoulder length hair. C4 interviewd the man who had cut his hair for years, BG had never in his life had anyhting other than v short hair - as he did on the day of the murder.

The other evidence was that he had 'lied' about never having seen a photograph of himself with a big model machine gun. He said he hadn't - and he hadn't - it was on an 11 year-old film of him that was found undeveloped in his flat during the search. It was a fancy dress party.

Also, much was made of his interest in guns - in fact the gun club he tried to join, and drank in the bar of a few times, refused him membership on the grounds that he was not really of adequate responsibility. he had never fired a gun, let alone owned one.

The gun that killed JD had been expertly adapted to be silent, and would have required a professional level of knowledge and skill.

The lab that provided the report on the one speck of gun residue were of the opinion that the speck could never be taken as proof, and could not link to any particular gun.. They were horrified when they realised what weight thier report had been given in the trial.

Protocol had not been followed. His jacket (the one with the residue) should have been bagged and sent straight to the lab. Instead it had been put on mannequin to be photographed - and the mannequin had been used to photograph lots of other items involved in gun crimes. A forensic expert said he doubted any lab would have agreed to do tests on the jacket had they known the degree of contamination it had been subject to - and certainly would have said how invalid the evidence was, in the report.

It sounds as if it was his sister who has kept up all this vigilence...I won't be hirung his lawyers if I get picked up for a crime I haven't committed!

Poor, poor man.

lulumama · 18/11/2007 15:55

thanks for that precis , blu

sounds like he deserved to win

it always sounded very sketchy evidence, but the public were baying for someone to be brought to book for the murder of a national treasure

Saturn74 · 18/11/2007 16:03

I saw the documentary too.
The evidence that convicted Barry George was flimsy at best.
I was interested to see that the prosecutors stated that BG had been obsessed with Jill Dando, but there was no evidence of this whatsoever.
They claimed he had newspapers about her in his flat.
He did.
Amongst hundreds of other newspapers, stacked in boxes.
The ones regarding Jill Dando were in no way singled out from the others by him.

I hope justice is done.
And if he is found innocent, I hope the perpetrator is found and convicted - but I don't hold out much hope.
So awful for the families of all concerned.

Blu · 18/11/2007 16:05

Oh yes - he had 8 JD articles amongst a total of 3000, I think!

Blu · 18/11/2007 16:06

he was so vulnerable - learning difficulties etc.

Saturn74 · 18/11/2007 16:07

It is a testament to his sister that he has finally won the right to appeal.

3littlefrogs · 18/11/2007 16:07

I never believed this man was guilty. It is a pity that this has taken so long because it means the real perpetrator has had ample time to cover tracks.

Mercy · 18/11/2007 16:08

I was pleased to see he has been granted a retrial.

Poor man didn't have a chance really.

Mercy · 18/11/2007 16:11

sorry, that was badly worded.

I meant he barely stood a chance in the original trial with the public (and the BBC) baying for blood and his learning difficulties seemingly not taken into account.

We've been here before haven't we?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page