Football club site - apparently they got seriously libellous about club management - some others whose postings were "merely 'abusive' or likely to be understood as jokes" don't have to be named. Interesting, considering the mp quote fandango . <<The case, featuring the website owlstalk.co.uk, is the second within days to highlight the danger of assuming that the apparent cloak of anonymity gives users of internet forums and chatrooms carte blanche to say whatever they like.>> <<Exposing the identity of those who post damaging lies in cyberspace is a growth area for libel lawyers>> <<Dominic Bray, of K&L Gates, Sheffield Wednesday's solicitors, said: "There seem to be quite a lot of websites that are using their anonymity to make comments about people and think that there shouldn't be any liability for it. But the internet is no different to any other place of publication, and if somebody is making defamatory comments about people then they should be held responsible for it. What these cases do is just confirm that's the law - the law applies to the internet as much as it does to anything else.">>