By ScaryScaryNight on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:06:56
Custy, how many pregnant women do you think continue to eat/drink everything on your list deliberately when knowing the risks?
By custenstein on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:09:33
i dunno scary - but i think they should be JAILED for eating sushi
By AitchTwoOh on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:10:47
scary made a good point, though, no sense in ignoring it. if women ate all the foods on your list, custy, and smoked, drank and took drugs... would you conclude that she didn't wish the child to live?
By custenstein on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:13:32
what would my conclusion matter?
You see - all the above (coupled with your first post).....tells me that aitch wasnt being 'anything' with you.
Then she said
By AitchTwoOh on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:21:58
why are you saying women should be jailed for eating sushi, other than to make some arsey point about civil liberties? by and large, when informed that eating, say, blue cheese, increases your risk of listeria and therefore harm to the baby, most women don't take the risk. they don't say 'oooh, it's too hard for me not to eat blue cheese, i rely on it when i'm stressed'.
fair question.
You answered with
By custenstein on Sun 14-Oct-07 21:32:05
why is my point arsey - but your points aren't aitch? to seem to take extra special effort when replying to my posts to be mean.
If you have a point of discussion ( which you clearly do) why not just air it without the associated vitriol?
I cannot see ANYTHING in the above that purports to her taking "extra special effort when reply to my posts to be mean" or "vitriolic". To say that is an exaggeration of the issue, and seems as though you are picking a fight with her.
I mean - an extra special effort to be mean? Really? Please show me where....