Sorry- me again! Have been pondering this.
I see it as a bit cultural. If they'd spray painted over a Y2 wall mural, one that had taken a lot of young kids time to design, and paint, we'd be justifiably angry.
But it wouldn't have made the national news.
I am trying not to trivialise what they have done, as it was a stupid, (drunken?) act of senseless destruction.
But do we care way more because it was an attack on a very middle -England, Cricket on the Green, and - will there be jam for tea?- image of 'life, before it got complicated ?'
I bet these (drunken?) youth would have destroyed the Y2 mural (or the Blue Peter Garden, remember that?)- in the same way, given that they have no regard for the sanctity of decades of harmless industry, which they would not have any mechanism to appreciate, unless they'd been made to watch James May. Or, at 12, had their iPhone whipped from their hand in favour of a Meccano set?
Of course they should, and will be punished (assuming their guilt), but aren't we attributing different cultural values, here?
Would Rod Stewart have offered to pay for the repainting of the vandalised Y2 mural?