Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

News

You can't let yourself go physically and still be intellectually together.

9 replies

emkana · 31/01/2007 19:52

Just one snippet from the highly relevant debate going on in the Daily Mail presently.

Look here

and here

Personally, I have let myself go physically recently, because I have three children under five, one with health problems, and I just haven't got the time or the inclination at the moment to invest a lot of time and/or effort in my appearance. Things might well change in the future.

But to make any assumptions about my intellect as a consequence...

OP posts:
WideWebWitch · 31/01/2007 19:52

Gosh, I can't be bothered to dignify this old shite from the DM with a debate!

emkana · 31/01/2007 23:11

Oh okay it's not really worth talking about, you're right.

OP posts:
WideWebWitch · 01/02/2007 06:31

Oh emkana, I didn't mean it was pointless, just that I generally froth at the mouth if I read the DM and so that was my way of saying 'nope, won't do it' - do debate it if you want to!

NotQuiteCockney · 01/02/2007 07:43

Hmm, I see "let yourself go physically" to mean "eat crap, not exercise, sit on sofa", which I do think would affect one's intellectual state.

But I looked at the second of the DM articles and had to go scrub my brain afterwards. It's all about appearancy stuff. I don't think you need to wear makeup to be smart!

Medea · 01/02/2007 08:49

I think the second writer is just saying that although you are still the same person intellectutally when you "let yourself go" (what a cruel phrase), you'll get less respect.

Which unfortunately is true. We live in a superficial culture.

Appearance counts for too much. As a result, women just have to find waysand it will be different for each womanof feeling OK about themselves when their physical attractiveness dimishes.

My friend/mentor, X, was up for an important writing award a few weeks ago. She is in her 50s. She is beautiful. At the awards party, I talked to another writeran elderly womanwho said "I haven't read X's work, but she is STUNNING."

I passed this praise on to X. She said, "God I would SO MUCH RATHER someone say my writing was good than that I was beautiful. I just could not be less interested in my appearance."

She is my new role model. I think she should be everyone's role model. We should all be able to say of ourselves, "I would so much rather be kind/a good mum/a good hedge fund analyist/a great [fill in the blank] than be beautiful."

Fillyjonk · 01/02/2007 09:07

um

its typical DM reader stuff isn't it?

ie sexist crap

bloody hell, don't get worked up about it, its just a rag for aspirant tory wives

{ducks at onslew on "well I am not married and I still read the DM type comments]

sorkycake · 01/02/2007 09:12

reading the DM, surely noone does!

emkana · 01/02/2007 09:22

It's fine www, I don't really want to debate it.

Just thought it was funny how the DM thinks it's worthy of an article plus a full-length reply...

I always end up reading the DM at MIL's house and am stunned at what they deem "newsworthy".

OP posts:
yellowrose · 01/02/2007 10:15

emkana - if your MIL buys and reads it then it is defo. NOT worth reading

I always make sure I do the exact opposite of what my in laws consider ok

New posts on this thread. Refresh page