The BNP are always claiming to be non-racist and saying it is nothing to do with race, and dreaming up other 'reasons' on a regular basis. But they always give themselves away, like Barnbrook did.
Bizarrely, they do have some non-white members. A Sikh of Indian heritage (but he was, of course, English) used to write a column in their paper. Having joined to keep out Hindus, I presume.
This is how the BNP define indigenous:
"We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe. The migrations of the Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the character of our family of nations."
There is very little on the website that could be construed as actively racist against non-white people (actually, I could find nothing - but wasn't very thorough in looking) but lots about patriotism for culture, homeland, history etc. Plenty that is offensive, Asylum Seekers are called 'invaders', for e.g, and lots, that if it came without the rest, would have MN-ers nodding - quality before quantity in agriculture, for e.g. Thay thrive on this 'respectable' front...silly Ms Clarke has obviusly falen for it and will hopefully be feeling the heat now.