Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

mps want to get a salary increase to 100k

38 replies

zippitippitoes · 03/12/2006 16:12

..quite shocked to see that on average they calim allowances of 130k

in order to avoid bad publicity labour mps have been advised to write individually to demand the increase rather than collectively!

are they worth it here

does paying them more make us likely to have better or worse ones?

OP posts:
expatinscotland · 03/12/2006 21:32

I'm not surprised at all.

Fiddling whilst Rome burns.

Classic.

southeastastra · 03/12/2006 21:34

the government is run by the old boys network, they help each other out, it's mad.

paulaplumpbottom · 03/12/2006 21:49

Thinking of themselves before their constituents.

WhenSantaWentQuietlyMad · 04/12/2006 08:30

Yes, it is sickening the way they get a cross party consensus on things like this. Democracy anyone????

zippitippitoes · 04/12/2006 08:47

they are discussing it now on five live radio

OP posts:
WhenSantaWentQuietlyMad · 04/12/2006 08:51

What's bad is that they know it will cause a furore, but they will do it anyway with a cross party consensus.

It makes you realise how potentially corrupt the whole system is. PR anyone?

BrummieOnTheRun · 04/12/2006 09:02

Mornin' all.

Saw this in the paper yesterday and choked on my cornflakes.

Not sure I have as much of an issue with the pay packet as the bloody expenses.

I can think of NO commercial organisation that would allow employees to claim individual expenses up to 250 quid without receipts! if they did, half the population would permanently be at lunch with their mates. (someone please DO correct me if that piece of info was mis-reported, of course). And how is the taxman dealing with all these undeclared expenses?

But the bigger issue for me is the package of allowances that allows them to exist outside the 'norms' of the rest of the population...housing allowances, 1st class travel (for godssake).

Uwila · 04/12/2006 11:01

What is their pension plan?

I do think MPs should be subject to the same taxation the rest of us get to enjoy. I think I need a receipt for a business expense that exceeds £5.

paulaplumpbottom · 04/12/2006 13:21

£250 is ridiculous, they could be spending it on anything.

slug · 04/12/2006 13:57

"The 1922 committee submission does not specifically call for a rise to £100,000, but it states that MPs? earnings have dropped 15% behind the private sector jobs"

And here was me thinking their job was public sector not private. Compare their earning with people who do just as long hours (or in many cases more) in the public sector (nurses, teachers anyone?) and I think you'll find they are very well paid indeed.

zippitippitoes · 04/12/2006 13:59

i think they just raise the issue of 100k through a sly leak to the press and then come in with a request for a bit less and think we won't be so bothered then (not that anyone has a say apart from themselves anyway)

OP posts:
fortyplus · 04/12/2006 14:02

The problem with MPs is that (with a few noteable exceptions such as Clare Short, Mo Mowlem, Tony Wedgwood-Benn) only self-serving arseholes want to do the job.

TheArcAngelTLV · 05/12/2006 18:33

may have been said already but....

THE GREEDY BASTARDS!

feel much better now Byeeeeee

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread