Ok - you can all lambast me for getting serious now
Where does this concept come from that we must only read newpapers and other media that is written from our own viewpoint?
Or that people somehow use newspapers for intellectual stimulation?
They are the last place I would go for that - any of them. I read them as I am interested in how other people (writers) perceive the world around us - and the more variety I manage to read the better.
Very few of us read because it is 'worthy' - rather we read because it interests us. Probablt 25% of the books I have ever read have been complete pap - but it doesn't mean I should never have read them.
I think it rather sad actually, if people only read what they perceive others to feel 'suitable' or shy away from reading something because somehow they may be tarnished by it! The mind is a powerful thing, well able to discern what is pap and what is not - but well able to enjoy the pap anyway
I feel even sadder for those that only read particular media because they feel that they are too intellectual to read anything else! They are missing out on a whole range of writing - challenging maybe, but writing nontheless.