I'm a governor at my dd's school. We've just been investigated after an incident (which was found to be unjustified). I cannot give any details as I have to be confidential, however, I can report that the powers that be are now satifisfied that the school has a clean record and that any recommendations have been acted on. The Director of Education in our LEA has written to the staff congratulating them on how they have reacted positively - that's the good side.
The bad side - our Head Teacher remains off work indefinately due to stress - her Union told her to take this action. It is unlikely she will return. The teacher who was accused offered to resign, however, we persuaded him to revoke his resignation. Our middle school head teacher remains off due to stress.
What caused the upset is that Social Services instigated the investigation ever so quickly (because they now have to following the Victoria Columbie (?sp.) (V.C.) enquiry. The LEA said in hindsight that the the investigation was too heavy handed and it was the first one they'd dealt with post V.C.
As Governors we acknowledged child protection is paramount above all else which is in lines with the Social Service action and we hope we have learned from the recommendations.
Now, if a child is being abused in school, then s/he has much better protection than before following the 'Post-V.C.' White Paper which has been subsequently produced after the enquiry. (Social Services are now very, very hot on this stuff following the Paper!)