Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Jobcentre Official tells Benefits Claimant “Get a Job or F***ing Hang Yourself”

9 replies

ttosca · 15/01/2014 18:41

A jobcentre worker has been suspended following a Facebook rant with a benefits claimant during which she told a father of three to “get a job or f*ing hang yourself”.

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) official Dawn-Marie Sanders (pictured above) is reported to have made several abusive comments aimed at 44 year old Scott Bignell during a mutual friend began a Facebook discussion on Channel 4’s latest attempt at poverty porn – Benefits Street.

One post read: “You are a drain on society… start paying taxes or hang ­yourself. I have rope…”

The DWP says it has suspended Sanders while it investigates the matter further.

This interaction is no worse than the hateful and bigoted comments made on the #BenefitsStreet hashtag by twitter users watching, and believing, the distorted view of people claiming benefits created by the show. But Benefits Street is just the latest in a long and sad list of poverty porn programming aired in recent time. Channel 4 have also brought us Skint, Benefit Busters, How to Get a Council House and Benefits Britain. The BBC even chipped in with We All Pay Your Benefits. This list is not even exhaustive, just some of the lowlights.

All of these shows, intentionally or otherwise, feed into a myth that the UK is some sort of paradise for benefit cheats.

In reality, benefit fraud amounts to just 0.7% of all claims. The total cost of benefit fraud is £1.2bn a year – this is less than half what administrative errors cost the DWP each year.

In these shows, most if not all of a handful of claimants are portrayed as milking it.

Meanwhile, the HMRC puts the gap between taxes due and taxes received at £30bn a year. A recent Oxfam report put the figure at £100bn.

Sadly, although tax evasion of up to 100 times more significant an economic issue than benefit fraud, it receives a tiny proportion of the air time. This allows the government to avoid tough questions about why, exactly, they are reducing the burden of taxation on the wealthiest who are already paying least. It also creates a public mood that welcomes, and even demands the government crackdown on those claiming social security. There is a word for media programming used to distort public mood in favour of a political goal by using misrepresented data: propaganda.

This Poverty Porn, point and judge programming, with its misleading statistics and sarcastic voice overs is just that. We must demand better from our broadcasters. And thankfully, many people now are. There has been sustained and high profile protest at the mischaracterisation of benefit claimants in Benefits Street – as at least a significant minority of the UK public call time on the scapegoating of immigrants, sick, disabled and unemployed people for woes brought upon them by their corporatized government and the private interests they serve.

www.scriptonitedaily.com/2014/01/15/jobcentre-official-tells-benefits-claimant-get-a-job-or-fing-hang-yourself/

OP posts:
NanaNina · 15/01/2014 20:25

Hi ttosca that is disgusting - I hope she loses her job.

I agree with every word of your post and have just posted at some length on the thread about the Benefit Street programme pout out by Channel 4.

ttosca · 15/01/2014 20:26

Hi Nana!

I didn't see that thread. Will have a look, thanks!

OP posts:
GlassCastle · 15/01/2014 20:30

I have been witness to disgusting treatment of clients of mine at the job centre. I used to accompany them and sometimes I wouldn't disclose who i was. I'd let the DWP employee behave in a rude dismissive manner then show them my ID and report them for harassment and victimisation of the mentally unwell.

Gave me some sense of justice.

Conversely I have encountered some very empathetic (and apologetic) DWP staff so it isn't just the job, it is that there are some nasty judgmental little worms working there.

boogiewoogie · 15/01/2014 23:09

Oh the irony. If she loses her job will she have to sign on too?

ttosca · 16/01/2014 06:58

Ha! I hope so...

OP posts:
BackOnlyBriefly · 16/01/2014 12:29

ttosca, I completely agree. I'm sick of the propaganda and how easily some people fall for it.

If she loses her job can we all tweet her and ask how big her plasma TV is and tell her how taxpayers are paying for everything she has. It would only be fair.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 16/01/2014 12:32

ttosca, I too agree with every word in your post.

ParsingFancy · 16/01/2014 12:41

Never mind that, if she keeps her job taxpayers are paying for everything she has.

She's a government employee dependent on both the taxpayer and an unending supply of unemployed people for her income.

If she's doing something of value to any of us, that's cool.

If she's taking our money and spending her days abusing vulnerable people, not so much.

ParsingFancy · 16/01/2014 12:45

There's a huge industry building up on the backs of unemployed and disabled people at the moment. All this enforcement, and the pointless "courses" delivered by people less qualified than those they're supposedly "helping" - a lot of it private companies getting government contracts.

Wonderful use of taxes. Hmm

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread