I also wonder whether there was a deal done or at least there is a strongh link between the recent extraditions and this one being blocked. There is also a styrong feeling around political blogs that this has been forced on the Home Secretary by back benchers disatisfied about the general unpopularity of the Govt and poor showing in recent opinion polls.
Abu Hamza has been fighting extradition for 12 years and the Gary McKinnon case has been dragging on for 10 years. The fact that Abu Hamza plus 4 others were extradited just a few weeks ago and then this case dropped looks too coincidental.
I also note as others do the inherent contradiction in the Theresa May stance over the Human Righst aAct. On the one had she has said she wishes to have it repealed or reformed as it has blocked Govt taking action against certain individuals but in the McKinnon case his human rights have been cited as the reason he was not extradited.
I am pleased Gary McKinnon has not been extradited and that it was the rght decison but there are other people, especially UK businessmen, who have been extradited or under threat of extradition where it is questionable whether they actually commited a crime under UK law at all.
Overall, the main postive thing here is that at last the UK is pushing back against US extra territorial reach of its legal system. We have an UK and EU legal system and it should apply to UK citizens who are alleged to have commited a crime on UK soil. There should be no question of 'jurisdiction shopping' that has certainly gone on in the case of businessmen who have been extradited.