I cannot see the benefit, in international terms, of leaving a bigger country, with political and economic clout that we share as part of that country, to become a much smaller with correspondingly much less clout internationally
When the United Nations was formed there were just over 50 independent countries in the world. Today, that figure has risen to almost 200.
Scotland?s population places us at exactly the mid-point among those countries: half the countries in the world are bigger ? and half are smaller ? than Scotland.
Of the 10 countries that joined the European Union in 2004, most became independent after 1990, and Scotland is bigger than six of them. All of these nations now have a seat at the EU top table, a right Scotland should enjoy too.
According to the International Monetary Fund our near neighbours Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Ireland (all of a similar size to Scotland) are wealthier than the UK ? Scotland has as much going for it as any of these nations, except being independent.
www.yesscotland.net/too_small_to_be_independent
The EU question is a tricky one. A major issue is that Scots are already EU citizens. If Scotland were not admitted to the EU that would mean revoking the citizenship of millions of people, and I think that is a pretty big deal.
With regard to euro vs pound, nobody disputes that Scotland would join the Euro when they are ready and when they meet the criteria. Until then the most sensible thing is to retain the pound.