Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Norman Kember-honourable and brave or a bit of a pompous arse??

409 replies

moondog · 25/03/2006 19:07

I'm plumping for the latter.....

OP posts:
koolkat · 30/03/2006 14:55

He will have to calm down a bit with his use of cursing at his neighbours and fellow diplomats, otherwise he may be told "you are fired" !

ruty · 30/03/2006 15:03

but the Afghanis will be so grateful that someone can finally show them how to run their country. Wink

DominiConnor · 30/03/2006 15:23

I'm not sure what there is to explain about Afghanistan. It's people indulge in appalling brutality against each other, the notion of religious tolerance is not only absent but seen by many as evil, women are chattels, and they can't even manage to stop foreign terrorists from taking over areas and using them to attack civilised countries.

I am sceptical of our ability to civilise Afghanistan, and the nearest thing I have to optimism is that we lack the ability to make it much worse even if we tried.

Am I eligbible to run for office in Aghanistan ?
Normally one has to be a citizen.

ruty · 30/03/2006 16:30

well if you were a citizen i might have more faith in your summing up of their national characteristics. Wink
I actually thought it was the Taliban who subscribe to the qualities you describe, helped to power by..hmm..let me see..who was it again? Don't know what that has to do with the ordinary Afghani. But maybe you know alot more about them than I do..

DominiConnor · 30/03/2006 17:03

The Taliban was helped by the USA as were the IRA.
But we beat the IRA.

koolkat · 30/03/2006 18:23

Interesting logic.

So let's get this right, first give them money, support and encouragement (i.e. Taliban and Saddam) then a few years down the line, once you have decided they have become sufficiently irritating, go and bomb them !

desperateSCOUSEwife · 30/03/2006 18:26

Dc spot on re last post

ruty · 30/03/2006 18:35

eh? But it was not just us that fighting the taliban -it was the USA -so odd logic indeed.

moondog · 30/03/2006 21:39

Er..how did we 'beat' the IRA exactly?
Quite a few of them are respected members of parliament-that strikes me as being quite an achievement.

OP posts:
koolkat · 31/03/2006 09:48

Good point moondog.

For example I think that if in Algeria the Islamisist parties had been allowed to form a new govt. (which in fact they deserved as they won the elections fair and square in a democractic process) the long-running bloodshed in Algeria could have been avoided. What the ruling regime decided to do instead is declare the elections null and void and thereby allow the Islamisists the perfect excuse to create more mayhem.

It is impossible to teach or preach democracy and at the same time do everthing possible to undermine the democratic process.

The fact that former IRA members are now in positions of power is a credit to the process of democracy.

DominiConnor · 31/03/2006 11:03

The IRAQ failed in their stated core objective of a united Ireland. If you take the time to read their political pronouncements that was a socialist state was well.

It was not a crushing victory, terrorist wars rarely end that way. But our side triumphed.

I'm not sure if (pedantically) we can say we have IRA MPs. They refuse to swear the oath of allegiance, and thus aren't allowed in.

But they are now in our process, not we in theirs.

Even the Americans have realised the folly of helping terrorists, was happening before 9/11 when they discovered that the IRA were training up Colombian terrorists in urban warfar.

Shame we never napalmed Boston.

koolkat · 31/03/2006 13:51

Napalming Boston now !

Gosh you do have an extremely violent side DC, don't you, you take turns in either insulting or violently killing a different nationality in every post.

Well, I guess it's one way of getting rid of your opposition Grin

moondog · 31/03/2006 13:54

You're just being silly now young Dom.
Sillier than me on one of my silliest days,and believe me,I can be bloody silly.

OP posts:
koolkat · 31/03/2006 14:12

Moondog - yes a bit of the good old British "fair play" will do DC some good Grin

ruty · 31/03/2006 14:12

[cue dambusters soundtrack.]

ruty · 31/03/2006 14:13

where did that n go?

koolkat · 31/03/2006 14:15

ruty - lol Grin

DominiConnor · 31/03/2006 15:33

The good people of Boston suported a group that tried to have me burned to death at 5. Not my friends.

ruty · 31/03/2006 15:38

eh?

poppadum · 31/03/2006 16:09

What, every one of the people in Boston?

DC, are you Peacedove heavily disguised and armed with a dictionary?/thesaurus?

koolkat · 31/03/2006 19:26

DC - come on you will have to tell us what this movement in Boston is, who they supported and why they tried to kill you when you were 5.

DominiConnor · 01/04/2006 13:42

The citizens of Boston gave copiously to the IRA. It elected politicians who helped it, and brought political pressure upon the police not to enforce the law when the IRA's helpers broke it.

ruty · 01/04/2006 18:10

but DC i thought you were an ex-catholic. How does that work then?

Senoracod · 01/04/2006 18:17

is htis thread still going on?
yawnsley

DominiConnor · 01/04/2006 20:03

I think the operative word here is "ex".
Hard to exactly date the transition but guess I was about 9.