Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Number of homeless families in bed and breakfast accommodation up by 44%

19 replies

FrothyOM · 17/09/2012 06:18

SAYS THE GUARDIAN www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/sep/17/homeless-families-bed-and-breakfast#start-of-comments

The number of homeless families put up by councils in bed and breakfast accommodation has risen by almost half, according to an analysis of official figures. The rise comes after ministers warned 20 councils not to house families in B&Bs for six weeks or more.

The National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, found that between January and March 2011 there were 2,750 families nationwide living in B&Bs. In the same period in 2012 this had risen to 3,960, an increase of 44%.

The federation also says the number of homeless families is increasing, pushing up demand for "emergency temporary accommodation" (B&Bs). In the past two years, the number of households accepted as homeless has risen by 10,000 to 50,290.

The problem is acute in inner London, where the government's policy of capping housing benefit has caused thousands of families to approach councils to help cover the shortfall between rent and state subsidies. Westminster council said it now had more than "1,150 households approach for advice and assistance due to the local housing allowance (LHA) cap. In July, 141 households approached for advice, an increase of 27 on the previous month."

"We believe the rise in acceptances is the result of the LHA caps and a high proportion of applications coming from families who are unable to find alternative accommodation, who we are required to accept through homeless legislation," the council said.

Because of the shortage of affordable properties for low-income people, many are being exported out of London. According to Westminster, "in the last month we have secured properties in Hemel Hempstead, Bletchley, Maidstone and Grays" to house the homeless.

The federation says this sort of temporary accommodation is preferable to B&Bs, which lead to poor people having no security of tenure. However, it warned that from April 2013, families living in these homes could be hit by another cap which limits the total amount of benefits paid to households to £500 a week.

"As [homes in the private rental sector] become more expensive to rent and manage, this could mean families are unable to pay the rent ? pushing them back into B&Bs, or even on to the streets," it said.

The government has not yet confirmed how the benefit cap will affect people living in temporary accommodation and what measures will be taken to protect the service.David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, said: "In a B&B, whole families can find themselves sharing one room and they are often shut out of their accommodation during the day, causing huge disruption to daily routines of school and work. Every child deserves a decent home to come back to after school, where they feel secure, and where they can sit down to do their homework. That is what temporary accommodation provides.

"Without the safety net of temporary accommodation, thousands more families will find themselves in a vicious cycle of homelessness.

"It is essential that the government puts in place measures to protect this crucial service and the vulnerable families who depend on it."

Mark Prisk, the Tory housing minister, said: "There is no excuse for any family to be stuck in bed and breakfast accommodation, and we have offered support to those 20 councils who between them account for 80% of families in this situation for an unacceptably long time.

"We have some of the strongest protections in the world to safeguard people from homelessness, and levels remain lower than in 28 of the last 30 years. Councils have a range of options at their disposal to help anyone facing the threat of losing their home, and to help them further we've increased the discretionary housing pot to about £400m over the spending period to help families with the transition to the new, fairer system of benefits."

OP posts:
FrothyOM · 17/09/2012 06:24

I thought this would happen. Sad

Bed and breakfast accommodation is no place for a family. When I was in one I had to share one room with two kids, had no laundry or cooking facilities, and had to be out between 9 and 5 every day.

MY B and B cost 400pw and that was outside London. This policy is going to cost as much or more than it's suppossed to save, isn't it?

OP posts:
pumpkinsweetie · 17/09/2012 06:46

I for one think its absolutely discusting that families with children are treated so badly.
If the uk carries on like this, it is very worrying the thought of families with kids living on the streets.
It is costing the council more than rent so im not understanding why they choose to pay for b&bs rather than paying more rent iyswim. Its also time they started building more affordable housing like what was available many years ago.

talkingnonsense · 17/09/2012 06:57

I think it's horrible for those people affected, but hope its a good thing if it forces some solutions to the high cost of housing- private rents seem astronomical at the moment, and housing benefit has to end somewhere- more social housing built would be great. Is there any kind of London weighting for housing benefit though? Or will there be more backyard bungalows?

gastonthebabyshusher · 17/09/2012 06:59

This is a shameful story. However I fear that it will get worse. How we are supposed to instil a sense of family and community pride when this is how we treat the people in our society. Unfortunately it appears that it doesn't matter what the actual cost is to us as long as it doesn't appear that someone is "getting one over on us" by living in a decent house in a decent area. No, you don't deserve it because you don't earn enough so go and bring up your family in squalor. Then we can segregate our society on the grounds of wealth. AngrySad

SunWukong · 17/09/2012 09:59

Not surprised, all the affordable housing isn't, all the council places are being sold off, those that where rented out to families are now turned into maximum capacity dormitories for migrant workers and all the private rentals are split up into tiny little studio and one bed flats for single workers to make the most money out of the space.

BlackberryIce · 17/09/2012 11:44

A bed and breakfast is better than the streets!

lalalonglegs · 17/09/2012 12:07

Frothy - where on earth did you go every day for 8 hours? I'm appalled.

edam · 17/09/2012 12:37

It's appalling. Especially in an allegedly civilised country, the seventh-richest in the world.

As for the minister's claims that 'we have some of the strongest protections in the world to safeguard people from homelessness' - really? That would be why we have thousands of families in B&Bs and councils have no duty to house single people?

Meglet · 17/09/2012 12:39

It doesn't suprise me Sad.

JuliaScurr · 17/09/2012 12:44

Jesus wept.
It is INTOLERABLE.

twoGoldfingerstoGideon · 17/09/2012 13:14

A bed and breakfast is better than the streets!

Speechless...

pumpkinsweetie · 17/09/2012 13:23

Tbh the conservitives have always wanted to eradicate the poor. Maggie thatcher the milk & house snatcher, we now have no houses as most have been sold on hence there is no affordable houses. Now Cameron has snatched money from the councils so they can pick and choose what to spend the money on -obviously not housing or surestart centres !

ginmakesitallok · 17/09/2012 13:30

Blackberry, no doubt a workhouse would be better than in the streets, maybe w should bring them back?

Appalling way to treat people.

FrothyOM · 17/09/2012 15:47

lalalonglegs Dropped one at school then carted the toddler around parent toddler groups, the library, friends houses, the shopping mall...

OP posts:
BlackberryIce · 17/09/2012 15:53

I say that as someone who has been homeless, with 4 dc in tow!! And I was homeless for a year.

A b and b is better than the streets. And I thought it was limited to 6 weeks.

lalalonglegs · 17/09/2012 16:16

Jeez, that sounds grim, Frothy. I hope you weren't there for long.

SunWukong · 18/09/2012 10:55

Better ways to do it tho, plenty of waste land about, why are the council's not putting caravans on them, they have to pay b and b places, wouldn't it be better just to buy caravans make laws so that they can use waste ground temporarily until the land owner redevelopes.

So many empty properties in London anyway i get so fucking sick, of them going on about building new homes, how's about doing something with the hundreds of derelict buildings we have rotting away it would be cheaper no?

NanaNina · 18/09/2012 23:30

I think this govt is all about rich people (the cabinet) waging war on poor people. I this this is the most evil govt I have seen in my lifetime - makes Thatcher look vaguely reasonable and I never thought I'd hear myself say that!
The issue about private rents and a ceiling being put upon the amount of HB paid for a 2/3/4 bedroomed house is utterly ridiculous. Where are people going to find a 3 bedroomed house for £325 per month, which is the ceiling, and already being applied. They will have to pay enormous "top ups" - maybe around £200 - £300 per month, out of low wages or benefits.

I think B & Bs for families are terrible, but assume this is because there is a huge shortage of temporary accommodation. Homeless people can of course apply for private rented property, but they need a month's rent up front and a deposit of approx £1,000, and landlords are often asking for a guarantor. Councils can loan this month's rent in advance and deposit, but not sure how many of them admit to this, and stick people in B & B instead, as it must be cheaper.

I think that this govt just do NOT care about people living on the margins of society and are out to make life very grim for people dependent upon benefits. The savings they will make from lowering HB is peanuts I gather, but it's another way of waging war on the poor.

The thing that they should be doing I reckon is to put a ceiling on what LLs can charge for private rented property, as many of them are making big bucks (and the govt of course are fine about this), rather than hitting the people in need of housing by reducing the amount of HB they will pay.

I think this govt is taking us back to the 1890's and the Poor Law although there used to be the "deserving poor" and the "undeserving poor" now all poor people are in the latter category. Shame on the Labour govt for not shouting from the rooftops about what this govt is doing to the most disadvantaged people in our society.

pumpkinsweetie · 19/09/2012 05:09

NanaNina-my sentements exactly, this goverment is here to faze all the poor or working out. They are the goverment for the rich and since they came into power there has been more poverty which i think is set to increase if they get their way.
I for one will be voting for anyone but them and i hope others do the same as anyone is at risk of being poor one day and if these nobs stay in power we have no hope

Atleast labour whether wrong or right actually cared about its poor unlike this lot swigging the finest liquors whilst we all struggleAngry

New posts on this thread. Refresh page