Go
text only version
change font size: A A A
corporatewatch.org
about
about us statement of aims support our work job postings links contact us news
news updates newsletter company profiles
overview arms trade biotech chemicals construction food & agriculture media migration oil / gas palestine pharmaceuticals privatisation public relations other research
overview aid & development corporate structures corporate technologies food & agriculture iraq migration palestine privatisation public relations repression of anti-corporate dissent reports
resources
donate
contact
shop
News
Latest News
August 08, 2012
August 06, 2012
July 27, 2012
July 6, 2012
July 4, 2012
July 1, 2012
June 8, 2012
May 21, 2012
May 3, 2012
April 5, 2012
March 30, 2012
March 17, 2012
March 2, 2012
February 17, 2012
February 8, 2012
December 22, 2011
November 9, 2011
September 26, 2011
September 6, 2011
August 12, 2011
July 15, 2011
June 01, 2011
May 10, 2011
April 6, 2011
March 24, 2011
February 24, 2011
February 10, 2011
January 19, 2011
January 5, 2011
December 15, 2010
December 4, 2010
November 10, 2010
October 21, 2010
October 5, 2010
September 8, 2010
August 19, 2010
July 22nd 2010
June 25th, 2010
June 9th, 2010
May 20, 2010
May 05, 2010
April 09, 2010
March 9, 2010
February 25, 2010
January 28, 2010
January 5, 2010
December 16, 2009
December 2, 2009
November 18, 2009
November 2, 2009
October 16, 2009
July 23, 2009
June 18, 2009
May 21, 2009
May 7, 2009
March 31, 2009
February 27, 2009
January 29, 2009
December 18, 2008
November 30, 2008
October 30, 2008
October 13, 2008
September 23, 2008
July 09, 2008
February 28, 2008
January 23, 2008
October 31, 2007
October 18, 2007
October 11, 2007
July 4, 2007
May 14, 2007
April 25, 2007
January 24, 2007
December 7, 2006
November 22, 2006
November 1, 2006
October 18, 2006
June 3, 2006
May 3, 2006
March 17, 2006
October 19, 2005
September 23, 2005
September 07, 2005
August 24, 2005
June 17, 2005
Subscribe
Receive Corporate Watch News via e-mail:
Subscribe
About Us
About Corporate Watch
Support our work
Contacts & Links
Corporate Watch
c/o Freedom Press
Angel Alley
84b Whitechapel High Street
London, E1 7QX
t: +44 (0)207 426 0005
e: contact[at]corporatewatch.org Using Benefits to Blackmail August 13, 2012
home >> Latest News
Gillian Wilkes, from the West Midlands, was recently made redundant after working all her life. She describes her shock at the Job Centre?s treatment of claimants, and explains the reasons for her refusal to participate in one of the government?s workfare programmes.
Following redundancy I had to claim Jobseeker?s Allowance. I read the rules and regulations to ensure I didn't fall foul of any stipulations and dutifully carried out my job search.
However, at my fourth signing on appointment I was told by the advisor that because I had not applied for two jobs within the last fortnight, my search was not adequate and that my benefit would be stopped. I pointed out that I had completed the required six 'tasks' on the agreement, which included contacting two companies to see if there were any job vacancies available. The regulations did not stipulate that applying for 2 jobs was a condition of receiving benefit. The advisor didn't agree with me and informed me that my job search would be sent to the 'Decision Makers' to see if the doubt was justified. In the meantime, my benefits would be stopped immediately for two weeks.
I was horrified as my disabled husband and I had no other income (his claim is linked to mine). Those two weeks without money were the most humiliating of my life. We had to ask for food hand-outs from friends and family, couldn't pay any bills and had to scrounge tins of food for our dogs and cat. After both of us working for 45 years (I'm 60 and my husband is 63) and paying a lifetime of tax and contributions, we were being punished because I hadn't applied for two jobs.
That was in May and, to date, I have still not been notified of a decision by the Decision Makers. I appealed against the sanction and heard nothing. When I contacted the appeals department, I was told that my case would not be heard until around September.
?Granny Groundworker?
Then, after signing on for just ten weeks, my advisor said she was referring me to the Mandatory Work Activity (MWA) programme. She handed me a letter without any explanation of what it was about. I asked her for some details and she mumbled something about skills.
A week later I received a text message from a company called Groundwork West Midlands telling me I had been referred to them. I checked them out on the internet and discovered they were an environmental company that trains young people in ?groundwork?. I then started to worry what this was all about. Am I to be trained as ?Granny Groundworker?, I wondered.
I then received a letter from this company, thanking me for attending an engagement meeting or telephone interview (I had been offered neither), and informing me that I was to start my MWA programme on the Monday coming. It said I must participate for 30 hours a week for four weeks at ?Acorns?. The letter stated if I did not have good reason for turning up then, for my first offence, I would lose my benefit for 13 weeks, and for my second offence I would lose it for 26 weeks.
What am I now? A criminal it seems! I was simply told that I must dress smartly in black trousers and white shirt. There were no details about the work or the company so I contacted them to request some information.
Acorns turned out to be a charity shop. Now, I don't wish to sound like I am above charity shop work, as I know charity shop workers do a wonderful job, but what skills am I going to learn that will help me find the sort of job I am seeking? I do not need discipline or time-keeping lessons. I have worked as an Administrator, Secretary and Finance Officer for the past 45 years but now I am just being used for free labour.
Adding ten hours a week travelling time amounts to a 40 hour week but I would still have had to sign on, attend interviews and complete a job search every day. That means I would have had to complete my job searches in the evening. I would have thought it was illegal to expect people to work day and evening.
The Department for Work and Pensions contradicts itself as this programme stops people from doing the very thing they need to be doing: looking for paid and fulfilling work.
I have paid enough tax and contributions in my lifetime to cover the cost of my benefit so I find it insulting that after just a few weeks of claiming, I am expected to work for every penny. The programme is a total waste of taxpayer's money, which would be better spent on skills courses for the young unemployed, not placing the older, experienced generation on these money wasting programmes.
Money owed
I have now read other people's accounts and experiences on the internet regarding this MWA and believe advisors pick on claimants that have been sanctioned before or have challenged them over other issues. I personally believe it is very wrong they can use a claimant's benefit to blackmail them. Why should someone's welfare be in the hands of some judgemental advisor who is anxious to show her superiors that she is fulfilling her quota? There doesn't seem to be any way of complaining about this or challenging the referral without going to the very people who have placed you on the programme in the first place.
The DWP claim the sanctioning of benefits has stopped on ?workfare? programmes but it is clearly continuing. The greedy employers who exploit the unemployed should try living themselves without income for 26 weeks. They would soon back out of this scheme.
I have refused to attend this program and have now received a letter warning me that my benefit may be sanctioned. Fortunately, my husband is now entitled to receive Pension Credit so I can sign off JSA.
I will fight for a refund of my sanctioned benefit from May. After all, I feel it is money I am owed and will sue for it in court if necessary. I hope others will do the same.
And I will continue to campaign against the injustices of this MWA program, both for the benefit of those who do not have the means to fight back and for taxpayers in general, who are not aware of how their contributions are being used.
Thank you for taking the time and trouble to read this.