Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

32 die a week after failing test for new incapacity benefit

102 replies

ttosca · 08/04/2012 13:41

By Nick Sommerlad on April 4, 2012 11:00 PM in Health

More than a thousand ­sickness benefit claimants died last year after being told to get a job, we can reveal.

We've highlighted worries about the controversial medical tests for people claiming Employment Support Allowance which are being used to slash the country's welfare bill.

The Government has boasted that more than half of new ­claimants are found "fit to work" - failing to mention that over 300,000 have appealed the decision and almost 40% have won.

Instead, employment minister Chris Grayling (below) says this ­"emphasises what a complete waste of human lives the current system has been".

Chris-Grayling.jpg

Here's another waste of human life.

We've used the Freedom of Information Act to discover that, between January and August last year, 1,100 claimants died after they were put in the "work-related activity group".

This group - which accounted for 21% of all claimants at the last count - get a lower rate of benefit for one year and are expected to go out and find work.

This compares to 5,300 deaths of people who were put in the "support group" - which accounts for 22% of claimants - for the most unwell, who get the full, no-strings benefit of up to £99.85 a week.

We don't know how many people died after being found "fit to work", the third group, as that information was "not available".

But we have also found that 1,600 people died before their assessment had been completed.

This should take 13 weeks, while the claimant gets a reduced payment of up to £67.50 a week, but delays have led to claims the system is in "meltdown".

Mr Grayling admitted last month that 35,000 people are waiting longer than 13 weeks. Commenting on the deaths of ­claimants, a Department for Work and Pensions official said: "It is possible that the claimant had already closed their claim and then ­subsequently died, meaning that these figures may be ­overestimating the true picture."

Of course, they're bound to include some people who died of ­something completely unrelated to their benefit claim.

David-Groves.jpg

But there are plenty of tragic cases - such as that of David Groves (above) who died from a heart attack the night before taking his work ­capability assessment.

The 56-year-old, from Staveley, Derbyshire, worked for 40 years as a miner and telecoms engineer but stopped on doctors' orders after an earlier heart attack and a string of strokes. His widow Sandra said: "When Dave was called in for a medical, he felt like he was back to square one.

"He was in a terrible state by the day he died. It was the stress that killed him, I'm sure."

Stephen Hill, 53, of Duckmanton, Derbyshire, died of a heart attack in December, one month after being told he was "fit to work", even though he was waiting for major heart surgery.

Citizens Advice told us it has found "a number of cases" of people dying soon after being found fit for work.

"There seems to be a clear link between the cause of death and the condition they were suffering from that led to the claim," said Katie Lane, head of welfare policy.

"We have always supported the idea that people who could work and want to work should be helped to do that. But we are seeing a lot of seriously ill and disabled people being found fit for work.

"We have serious concerns about whether the test used to decide if people are fit for work is the right test."

The work capability assessments are carried out by private firm Atos, on a £100million a year contract.

The firm made a £42million profit in 2010 and paid boss Keith Wilman £800,000, a 22% pay rise on the previous year.

The response to our FOI request:

Thank you for your Freedom of Information request of 16 February 2012. You asked:

Can you please provide me with the number of ESA claimants who have died in 2011?

Can you please break down that number into the following categories:
? Those who are in the assessent phase
? Those who have been found fit to work
? Those who have been placed in the work related activity group
? Those who have been placed in the support group
? Those who have an appeal pending

The table below provides data on the numbers of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) claimants where the Department holds information on a date of death being recorded in 2011 and whose latest Work Capability Assessment (WCA) date (or activity towards assessment) was before the end of August 2011, the latest data available.

In total, between January 2011 and August 2011, some 8,000 claims ended and a date of death was recorded within six weeks of the claim end. This represents about 1% of the total ESA caseload in May 2011 (the latest caseload data available). The table below shows the position of these claims when they were closed.

Those in the Support Group receive unconditional support due to the nature of their illness, which can include degenerative conditions, terminal illness and severe disability.

Note it is possible that the claimant had already closed their claim and then subsequently died, meaning that these figures may overestimate the true picture. Care should therefore be taken when interpreting these figures.

WCA Outcome at most recent assessment and number of claimants with a recorded date of death

Assessment not complete 1,600
Work Related Activity Group 1,100
Support Group 5,300
Total 8,000

All figures have been rounded to the nearest 100.

Data on the number of ESA claimants that have died following a fit for work decision is not available, as the Department does not hold information on a death if the person has already left benefit.

The Department does not hold information on the number of claimants who died whilst an appeal was in progress.

We then asked for:

The total Employment and Support Allowance caseload figures most comparable with the ones in the FOI request, eg Jan-Aug 2011, showing how many ESA claimants are put in support group, WRAG group, fit to work or claim ended.

Clarification on whether these figures are only new ESA claims or whether they include the transfer from Incapacity Benefit?

Clarification on the six-week cut off figure - why was that selected?

We were told:

As at August 2011 there were around 730,000 people receiving ESA. In the three quarters Jan-Sep 2011, 380,000 people left ESA. It is not possible to provide the further detail you request.

These figures only cover new ESA claims - claims from IB recipients are not included.

The six-week figure is used routinely within the department when looking at where people go after leaving benefits.

However, there are more figures on the outcome of Work Capability Assessments on the DWP website here and here.

blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2012/04/32-die-a-week-after-failing-in.html

OP posts:
SardineQueen · 08/04/2012 13:50

V long post so ran out of steam a bit but I get the gist thank you very much for posting.

i think they are trying to get rid of / water down FOI on the basis it costs too much... So these sorts of revealing figures might not be so easy to obtain in the future.

2old2beamum · 08/04/2012 15:51

Like SardineQueen long post but get your message, sadly I did not know the full implications of ESA (until now) I think we should be very afraid. DD is at the beginning of her assessment. Anybody out there willing to give a lovely lady a job. BTW she has Down Syndrome unresolved heart problems and has a pacemaker but still has "drop attacks" plus poorly controlled asthma. Any takers.Hmm Sad

Serialkipper · 08/04/2012 16:02

Thank you lots for that.

twofingerstoGideon · 08/04/2012 17:19

Speechless Sad

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 17:58

This is, of course, a useless story. People who are in work who are not on any benefits die as well. To have any meaning you need to look at relative rates. You would expect fewer people as a proportion of those in the WRAG to die than those in the support group.

What worries me is the scaremongering that implies that someone who does not get ESA will not get any benefits. I saw someone about a fortnight ago who had ended up going without any benefits because his ESA had stopped and he did not understand that he was due to get JSA (or Income Support). Hence he had not put in a claim.

2old2beamum · 08/04/2012 18:06

What is the point of JSA if you can't get to an interview without help & BTW JSA rates are cosiderably lower than ESA/IB

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 18:30

The rates are lower, but they are not zero. The point of JSA (and the associated Housing Benefits and other passported benefits - which admittedly are now limited at £25,000 per annum) is that it gives people money to live on.

If you include housing and council tax benefits as well as JSA the total benefits are as a proportion higher than ESA and LHA/CTB.

JSA over 25 is 67.50pw. ESA in the assessment period is 67.50pw. If someone is in the support group they can get up to 99.85 in the WRAG it is up to 94.25.

The story refers to those in the WRAG. I accept that £5.60 per week is an important sum to people on a low income. However, the article does not say anything significant apart from people who are in the support group are less healthy and hence more likely to die than those in the WRAG.

Serialkipper · 08/04/2012 18:38

john, I have had Incapacity Benefit stopped following the transfer-to-ESA assessment. I am about to apply for JSA but will not get it, as a condition for receiving JSA is to be available for any work 40 hours a week.

I'm not available to even sit upright 40 hours a week.

So I'm eligible for nothing. And obviously get no passported benefits either.

I am now completely dependent on the charity of my friends and family.

mercibucket · 08/04/2012 18:40

No sorry, johnhemming, my brother failed the test despite having profound mental health problems, exacerbated by brain tumour removed a long time ago, plus aspergers. Who know which of those conditions means he can't work - but as he has severe paranoia and only speaks to 3 people (I'm not one) he has no chance of claiming jsa - there is no way he could possibly fulfil any of their basic requirements
But as he is 'fit to work' it's back to the bank of mum and dad, who've been supporting him singlehanded for the last 10 years.
Bet the govt love that part though! Lucky they can afford to imo, else he'd be another mentally ill homeless person

TheGreatestmadhairDayinHistory · 08/04/2012 18:44

Yes - there is a trap between ESA and JSA. A lot of people signed off ESA as 'fit to work' Hmm cannot then get JSA as they will need to be ermmm....fit for work. And they are not, often.

ATOS is taking money to get people off ESA. It's ruthless and terrifying. The implications of all this are going to be shocking, even more so when a load of people will lose DLA next year when it is changed to PiP and all the boundaries changed - the definitions of disability narrowed so much that some of the most vulnerable will lose not only some, but all of their support.

All in it together, yes? Hmm

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 18:58

If people are falling into this trap then they need to contact their MPs office - urgently (in practise that means on Tuesday).

There are lots of schemes for ensuring that people get support (particularly if they have children).

TheGreatestmadhairDayinHistory · 08/04/2012 19:03

That doesn't do a thing John, especially if the MP happens to be of a certain mindset Wink

What schemes would they be?

TheGreatestmadhairDayinHistory · 08/04/2012 19:14

Actually I take that back, I sincerely believe in contacting local MPs about these matters, but have yet to see how this helps in an acute situation.

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 19:15

I know what to do in Birmingham. It varies across the country.

AnxiousPanxious · 08/04/2012 19:19

This is such a sad thread for more than one reason.
Our country is not better lately.

Flightty · 08/04/2012 19:19

You might very well know what to do. Thousands of vulnerable people don't. They are the ones that could use some of that info.

You don't even get TOLD what the WRAG entails when they put you in it (after making you wait 6 months for the result of an assessment it took you three months to psyche yourself up for and three hours to be seen at, due to another cock up)

How many more cases can each benefits adviser/advocate take on? Most people don't even know they EXIST.

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 19:36

I don't want to mislead people. When I deal with benefits issues it takes a few minutes to get the details of someone's situation. Hence I would simply say "talk to your MP".

I would also say that it is not intended that people who come of ESA are not entitled to means tested benefits.

However, there are all sorts of complications relating to other income, when people qualify for housing benefit and what is a contrived tenancy etc etc. This info is available on the net.

These are useful sites
www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_200090.html
www.cpag.org.uk/

Flightty · 08/04/2012 19:50

Thankyou John and I'm sure you do your level best to help those you come into contact with.

It's just, there are so many more of us...and do you know what, talking to your MP doesn't even occur to most people. Especially if you have a tory MP who is an utter twit who did jack all for you last time you asked him you get my point.

People on ESA are often in the lowest possible mood before and after their assessment. It destroys your life, it really does, waiting for it, attending it knowing full well you'll be looked at with scepticism...they don't even believe a letter from your GP. They don't believe you. You're basically on trial.

And to fight an appeal - or to ask for more help, or to go and see someone you've never even met, well it's unlikely. It's really unlikely unless you have a huge amount of support and advocacy and people pushing you on and doing it for you.
It takes courage and FIGHT and people who have failed an assessment for ESA DO NOT HAVE these things in nearly all cases. They are at the bottom of the pit, emotionally and mentally and often physically.

Crossing them off the list at ATOS so you get your bonus/commission only to go on and find in favour of 40% of appellants tells you just what a money driven pile of shit it is. They don't READ your report. They just consign you to make up the numbers.

Atos are completely unsuitable for these purposes but I think you know that.
The point is people WILL be suicidal, I certainly was at various points during my switchover from one to the other and so, you see, people will die for that reason alone. They will. Because they don't have anything on their side to stop them.

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 20:18

I accept that there are challenges. However, what is important in this is to ensure that people do not think that all support is to be withdrawn. That I know can make people suicidal.

You are right in that a simple letter from the GP will not be sufficient. However, I have dealt with people who have appealed and the assessment processes are being looked at.

Flightty · 08/04/2012 20:22

I am very glad to read and hear on the news that there is some fuss being made about this, however until it actually changes anything on the ground so to speak I shan't hold out much hope. We are under the tories. We don't count for much.

thanks for your fair comments.

Flightty · 08/04/2012 20:24

Could you get them to write better letters?

The one I got didn't make sense. I still have NO idea what is expected in the WRAG. Or how long I will get it for, when next assessment is, how often I'll have to go to the jobcentre etc etc. It's like standing on a precipice.

The information sharing is pitiful.

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 20:45

I don't want to try to do any casework in a forum. It does not take long to do things properly, but I really need to see letters and talk to people about details.

I run an weekly advice bureau in Birmingham at which I deal with casework (apart from having a team that helps me with this who also have an open office 11-2 each work day).

Serialkipper · 08/04/2012 20:46

john can you tell me what support exists for a single, childless person who has been declared Fit to Work (so no ESA) but does not meet the criteria of being able to work 40 hrs/wk (so no JSA)?

Let's make it simple.

They have no other income and no significant savings. They are being housed by family but are not living with a partner or cared for by anyone.

The DWP's own benefits calculator says this person will get zilch.

Are you claiming otherwise?

yakbutter · 08/04/2012 20:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

johnhemming · 08/04/2012 20:52

Probably Income Support, but I would need to talk to them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread