Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Waiting with baited breath! What will the chancellor do with CB on Wednesday.

381 replies

chickydoo · 19/03/2012 09:27

Probably been done to death, but holding my breath to see what the budget will bring for child benefit on Weds? Will there be a U turn?
What do you think will happen?

OP posts:
spammertime · 21/03/2012 15:15

Sorry - is this 50k GROSS or 50k NET income?

NoMoreInsomnia12 · 21/03/2012 15:15

"the HR taxpayer will have to tick a box on their tax return confirming that someone living at their address is claiming CB?"

But what if the HR taxpayer doesn't currently fill in a tax return because everything is collected through PAYE?

Still means more tax returns required = massively more administration.

OrmIrian · 21/03/2012 15:17

The thing with the issue of 'unfairness' is that it tends to be in the eye of the beholder. if CB was going to be means-tested there has to be a threshold - and wherever that threshold was it would seem unfair to someone. We can all say 'Wow! That couple earn 100k each, they don't need CB' and most people would agree. And we probably would all agree that a single-earner of 30k should get it. But there is a massive grey area in the middle and most of us fall into it.

mumsneedwine · 21/03/2012 15:20

I would have no problem with a fair household income test whatever the threshold. I don't know if this affects me or not as only know hubbie pays 40%, but I still think its unfair.

mumsneedwine · 21/03/2012 15:21

Spam - £50k gross.

Changebagsandgladrags · 21/03/2012 15:27

I am wondering about the childcare vouchers thing, that would take DH under £50k. Or he could ask his work to pay him £49,999.99p instead of £51,000.

Have I got the maths right here. £1000 over £50,000 means a 10% cut in child benefit? So the £1,000.01p cut in salary would work out worse off, the 10% CB would be better? I think we only lose £172 or something (have two kids).

moonbells · 21/03/2012 15:28

Aha - thankyou for answering my questions PessimisticMissPiggy

So you can take off your tax allowance, your pension contributions, probably childcare vouchers, gift aided donations, then add back in any private health benefits, company cars, oh wait a minute... these are all the things that go to getting your tax code.

They're going to go by tax codes. Watch your codes, folks.

moonbells · 21/03/2012 15:30

What makes me cross is that they're talking about making public sector pay regionally-variable. So what next? Child benefit that goes down by geographical area too because you don't need as much?

Angry
BoffinMum · 21/03/2012 15:32

Even Mrs T didn't shaft women this thoroughly.

spammertime · 21/03/2012 15:33

Thanks mumsneedwine.

Looks like HMRC need to change their website referring to adjusted net income then!!

And the bit about how they're going to do this for 12-13 is clear as mud. Would surely be worth their while in admin costs to just bring this in from 6 April 13.

spammertime · 21/03/2012 15:35

But moonbells, with real time information this will all be a breeze!! Wink

mumsneedwine · 21/03/2012 15:36

Agree spam. Jan 2013 seems an odd date !

FruitSaladIsNotPudding · 21/03/2012 15:39

Why does it say on HMRC site that this is for adjusted net incomes over £50,000? I am confused.

Also, pension contributions are protected, it says.

www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2012/cb-income-tax.htm#a4

QueenMaeve · 21/03/2012 15:41

I still am confused! Is the phased out 1% drop for every £100 over £51,000 just based on the higher earners wage or do they do this on total household income?

FruitSaladIsNotPudding · 21/03/2012 15:44

Because if it's net income then that's obviously a lot higher than £50,000!

QueenMaeve · 21/03/2012 15:46

So is it based on the net income or not?

mumsneedwine · 21/03/2012 15:48

It is as clear as mud what the adjusted net income may be. And it's all based on one income. I really must go and do some work !!!

OddBoots · 21/03/2012 15:59

I can't see anything on the HMRC site clarifying what happens if you are living in a multi-generational home and a grandparent earns £50k+ There must be people in that situation.

HerRoyalNotness · 21/03/2012 16:03

This is still with the old figures.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11465116

I was more interested in the potential savings, 1billion pounds. I wonder if they have factored in the costs of administering the new system, which sounds a bit complicated, and if people think there should be exceptions. There will be much form filling, phoning of call centres, assessing of claims, repayments of overpayments. It sounds like an awful lot of hassle.

They could save some money on CB by scrapping it for children not actually residing the UK, but leaving it as it is for children that actually are.

(NB, it doesn't affect us as we live abroad and I dutifully wrote a letter to inform them of this as soon as we left the country)

hellokittyrules · 21/03/2012 16:06

i am please as dh earns 46k at old 42k cut off would have lost out now with new
50k cut off wont lose cbs so relieved!!
i only do bettwere and look after 2dds 3 and 6 years
i need cbs for there clothes,shoes,xmas and bday presents and other bits they mite need
dh uses his wages for morgage and all bills

wimini · 21/03/2012 16:09

woo hoo! George Osbourne is my new best friend.

TheCrackFox · 21/03/2012 16:12

How much can the government expect to save compared with how much this will cost to administer. TBH it sounds a logistical nightmare.

joannaheather · 21/03/2012 16:15

Okay.... someone help me here. I am a separated mum with young children. I have a partner who earns over the £60k cut-off but he is not my children's father. I work almost full-time to contribute to the household and earn about 12k a year. I am going to lose my child benefit. My ex-husband earns just on £50k. Can I transfer payments into his name so we don't lose out for the sake of the children entirely?

Housemum · 21/03/2012 16:29

The adjusted net income is poorly worded - I don't think it has anything to do with net of tax. I searched the phrase on the hmrc site and it showed an example of it in relation to pensioners - it was salary less pension contributions plus benefits in kind eg company cars.

breadandbutterfly · 21/03/2012 16:30

Gross or net?

Big difference - HMRC link clearly state net income - but the media seem to be saying gross.

Swipe left for the next trending thread