There is no question in my mind that this move is not about providing a better, more supportive or even independent service for women facing unplanned pregnancy. Dorries is clear about her objectives - to reduce the number of abortions that take place, full stop. The agenda here is to reduce access to safe, legal abortions by stealth.
The argument that pro-choice organisations that provide reproductive health services, including terminations, cannot provide independent counselling is hogwash. If this is the case, the same rule should apply to all procedures - that "independent" counselling from a totally separate provider must be given before fertility treatment, sterilisation or even things like cancer treatment can proceed.
Show me the evidence that Marie Stopes, BPAS or any other organisation that provides reproductive health services (including terminations) do not provide adequate advice, information and independent counselling on all the options available when facing unplanned pregnancy. It doesn't exist. However, those who wish ultimately to make abortion illegal trade on the myth of the profit-hungry abortionists who push vulnerable women into abortions they don't want. Insisting that the charities contracted to provide reproductive health services are too biased to do the job right is just a sub-set of this nasty myth.
This Mystery Shopper Study found that most of those so-called "independent pregnancy counselling providers" provided inaccurate information, used emotive language and clearly attempted to steer clients away from having abortions. It is just these organisations that will be in line for lucrative contracts from the NHS to provide counselling services for women before they will be allowed to have abortions.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that they ask women to wait quite a while to have counselling, or ask them to come back for more counselling before proceeding to the next stage of the process. By delaying, they would hope that women will re-think their decision, both because of the later gestation but also because the procedure at a later stage is clinically more risky than an early medical or surgical abortion.