the papers and online news have been bursting with super injunction talk. whilst im interested in it all to some extent, why the hell was there not more on the judgement made against the three generals responsible for the genocide in Rwanda? after years of trial they get imo a piddly sentence for being responsible for the death of 800,000 people, yet it was all barely mentioned underneath waves and waves of "news" about who some has been from BB shagged. went to talk about the judgement with DH yesterday he didn't even here of it. so three war criminals are convicted by an international court and given frankly insulting sentences yet the whole world is talking about bryan riggs.
please tell me i am not the only person who would rather hear about why 3 men only got 20 years for genocide rather than some footballer who couldn't keep it in his pants.