A Tesco Express has just been granted permission in a secondary parade near where I live despite a signed petition against it, genuine concern about traffic congestion re deliveries (a layby will need constructing), the parade already served by an Iceland, Alldays and a Co-op and an independent bakers, grocers, card retailer and a Boots. There was no need for Tescos - what is their motive ?
Their planning application was submitted a week before Christmas so many people were unaware due to bank holidays etc. In the end due to the objections the council agreed to take it before the planning committee so councillors could decide (although they didn't have to). In the end the council decided that whilst they were not happy about it, they would have to grant Tescos permission because they could not afford the £70,000 + should Tescos go to appeal (which no doubt they would). There was adequate grounds for refusal for traffic/pedestrian concerns alone.
Our town already has upwards of 10 tescos including a Tesco Extra. A couple of years ago they opened a Tescos Express opposite an independent Londis store (again nothing the council could do as the premises had planning already). Tescos only motive must have been putting a independent trader out of business (he is still trading although with a substantially reduced turnover).
Tescos could decide not to open these stores, make an ethical decision based on how their stores will effect the surrounding area and trading but they chose not to.
I, for one, never shop in Tescos and unfortunately, until others do likewise, Tescos will carry on with impunity.