Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Call for health warnings on 4x4s - BBC News

6 replies

fimac1 · 07/10/2005 13:53

Call for health warnings on 4x4s

The researches looked at studies into road accidents

Four-wheel drives - or 4x4s - should carry health warnings because of an increased injury risk to pedestrians compared to ordinary cars, experts say.

Trinity College Dublin experts say increasing numbers of people are driving these type of cars.

But, writing in the British Medical Journal, they say the risk to pedestrians comes from the car's design rather than the numbers on the roads.

They say warning notices should be put on 4x4s to raise awareness of risks.

SUVs are no more unsafe than any other type of car Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders spokesman

Sales of this type of car, also called sports utility vehicles (SUVs) have increased by 15% across Europe in the past year, while sales of standard cars have dropped by 4%.

The researchers add that in the US, 40% of new vehicles bought by drivers are classed as light trucks or vans - many of which are SUVs.

A recent study in America found that, for the same collision speed, the likelihood of a pedestrian fatality is nearly doubled in the event of a collision with a large SUV compared with a passenger car.

Other studies report higher rates (up to four times) of severe injury and death.

Risk reduction

Ciaran Simms, a lecturer in mechanical engineering and Desmond O'Neill, associate professor of medical care for the elderly, said that the increased risk from SUVs is caused by the design of the front end of the vehicles.

Pedestrian injuries from ordinary cars are mainly leg fractures and knee injuries from the initial impact with the bumper, and head injuries from the secondary impact with the bonnet or windscreen.

But researchers say that, because SUV bonnets are higher than those of cars, there is a more severe initial impact on the upper leg and pelvis, and a doubling of injuries to vulnerable regions such as the head, thorax, and abdomen.

The researchers add that elderly pedestrians are already known to be at high risk.

People over 60 are more than four times as likely to die if injured by a car than younger people.

Challenge

The report authors call for a number of measures to reduce the risks associated with SUVs, including changing crash investigations so the type of cars involved in accidents with pedestrians is identified.

They also call for warning notices on SUVs to help inform consumers of the increased risks of severe injuries and death associated with the vehicles.

They add: "Addressing the hazards posed by SUVs to pedestrians is an emerging and real traffic safety challenge in the developed world."

But a spokesman for the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said: "We recognise that all vehicles can be dangerous when in an accident with a pedestrian."

He said the BMJ researchers had focussed on US research, rather than UK or European work - and US vehicles were bigger.

"SUVs are no more unsafe than any other type of car."

However, the Irish researchers said they had looked at European research, and their findings were valid for cars used in Europe, as well as the US

OP posts:
Caligula · 07/10/2005 13:58

What a tosser the bloke from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders is. On what basis does he say "SUV's are no more unsafe than any other type of car"? On the basis of wanting to sell more of them, rather than any decent research he can produce? Creep.

Freckle · 07/10/2005 14:11

What use is a health warning on the car to the pedestrian? Are you supposed to read it immediately before impact so that you know in advance that your injuries are going to be worse? After all, the people buying them aren't going to take any notice of such a notice, are they?

Perhaps they should just whack up the tax on such cars - although a vast number of them are company cars so the drivers don't give two hoots.

edam · 07/10/2005 14:12

Thanks Finmac1. I was stunned when you said 70 per cent of children hit by SUVs will be killed on that other thread.

Caligula, that's the sort of response companies give all the time to Which? reports - just deny there's a problem and try to confuse the issue by making an allegation that is not even true eg. 'this study was looking at American cars and ours are all different.' Used to drive me up the wall when I worked there because journalists would always put it in for balance - but you shouldn't 'balance' a story by including something that isn't effing true!

edam · 07/10/2005 14:13

Um, I think it would be useful to put a warning on the cars so at least drivers can't plead ignorance. It might even make some people think more carefully about buying them, who knows?

Caligula · 07/10/2005 14:15

I doubt it though Edam. Surely even the most ignorant 4x4 driver knows how dangerous they are to pedestrians by now, don't they? Isn't this common knowledge? Or is it only common knowledge on Mumsnet?

Freckle · 07/10/2005 14:18

Quite. Look at all the furore there was about bull bars - totally unnecessary for anything other than aesthetics and very dangerous to pedestrians, but I still see them all over the place. In fact it's rare to see an SUV without them.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page