@cherrypie66 , because schoolchildren spend so much time at school and have so many social interactions there, the idea has taken hold that school is a GOOD preparation for later social life. But is it? It wasn't designed with that purpose in mind. In fact, I remember my teachers saying, "We are not here to socialise, young lady!"
If you look critically at the social environment at school and outside of school, you may notice that the social skills needed at school are often very different from those which kids will need elsewhere. I'll give you an example from my own life.
When I was nine, a boy in my class was often teased at school. He talked at length about his special interests, sometimes drooling in his excitement. He didn't always notice whether other people were interested. He tended to insist on playing games his way. He took little interest in fashion and wore his trousers shorter than the other kids. His hair wasn't cut like the other boys' hair.
At school, I avoided him. I didn't actively pick on him, but I was only just civil to him. I didn't intervene when the other kids were nasty to him. I tried not to sit next to him at lunch, in case they thought he was my friend - or worse yet, boyfriend: you were NOT allowed to be friends with boys! I knew I'd be ostracised if I associated with him. When you're stuck with the same kids 30 hours a week, ostracism is a powerful threat. Your social interactions are never private. They take place under the relentless spotlight of peer judgement. And anyway, there were other kids at school who were more appealing playmates for me, as they shared my interests and didn't insist on playing games their way.
But this lad was also my neighbour. We lived across town. The other neighbour kids went to the local school. Away from school, I treated him much better. I was free of the fear that I'd get bullied if somebody saw me playing with him. In the neighbourhood, he wasn't bullied or excluded. Sure, he wasn't our first choice of playmate, but whenever we needed somebody to make up a team for a kickaround, of course we would ask him, just as we asked the little five year old from over the road. He and I would fall out sometimes, but as soon as we were bored or lonely we'd make it up. In that setting I could learn to be patient and get along with someone different from myself.
Only when I was grown up did it even occur to me that I could have treated him better at school, could have stuck up for him there, could have made time to play with him sometimes rather than leaving him invariably alone on the playground. But was that even possible? It would take a very brave kid to do the right thing at the risk of being bullied herself. I guess I wasn't that brave. By nine I had unconsciously absorbed the social skills required to survive at school. It didn't even occur to me to flout the unspoken social rules by being nice to an unpopular child.
Never since school have I been in such an unforgiving environment that I couldn't risk being nice to someone who was lonely. I guess I don't blame myself much for how I treated him. I did what was appropriate for the environment I was in. But behaving that way didn't feel right, and I was relieved that I could acquire different social skills the very moment I left school.
My own kids are 22 and 15, both home educated from the beginning. I've seen them face all sorts of social situations (yes, home educated kids do actually have friends). Sometimes they've made good choices and sometimes not. But it has always seemed to me that they had a better range of choices available to them than schoolchildren do, and that allows them to develop strategies which are relevant to the world we all live in. As @triflinpud says, they are in that world already, rather than being segregated from it at school.